View Single Post
Old Oct 15, 2008 | 08:09 AM
  #80 (permalink)  
I'm Slow's Avatar
I'm Slow
I'm Slow
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 10,608
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by specVmatt
its one guys word against the other. and then another person always defending bvp. i competely understand the term pay to play. but at least be able to play for 9 seconds before paying. not hating on you joe, really, but to an extent, the customer is always right. in this case, i do believe the customer is right. he may have been wrong to hurry and put the car back to stock, but understand.. after the mess ups that was caused, i wouldnt want them continueing the work on my car either. you know what i mean? when ARD Performance messed my car up, i didnt want them to fix it. i wanted them to pay subaru to fix it, in which they did. bvp should take responsibility to pay subaru to assure the car is back to stock and in good working condition. if damian wants to mod the car in the later future, then whatever. he brought the car in perfect working condtition, thats how it should come out. being that bvp damaged the car in someway, they should pay to have it fixed, by subaru.

You are right buddy and I understand Damian's decision to go back to stock and it was his choice to make. It just kills me how the other people on here talk shit when they really have no clue what really happened and what went wrong. it's all speculation and assumptions at this point which isn't fair to the shop.
__________________



550/550