Although I posted my claim in the "best Toyota of all time" thread, I'm not 100% certain that I think the MkIII is. Regardless, time has not been kind to the MkIII, and as such, the features I had referred to were applicable from 87-92.
Originally Posted by
Troux
That are broken on 90% of MK3s.
I dunno if they are broken on
that many...you're talking about the percentage of MkIII owners that are cheapasses as well!
Originally Posted by
Troux
A lot of people will argue that it's worthless garbage, though I think it fit the car very well.
I cant say personally as I have not driven a car nor ridden in one with it, but keep in mind the LF-A concept DOES include it!
Originally Posted by
Troux
Now THAT is worthless.
Wrong...how many other cars spell out the exact engine codes when a CEL comes on? Other than that, its just a flashy blue LED clock
Originally Posted by
Troux
All because they are mostly broken down.
No kidding
Originally Posted by
Troux
Sorry, but no way.
You've been driving/around the wrong ones then. With basic maintenance, they are as reliable as any other Toyota. They break for the same reasons that DSMs do: their owners dont put money and work towards what matters.
Originally Posted by
Troux
Pretty sure that was for weight savings.
The full size spare weighs like 48 lbs, so yeah I can definitely see the weight savings, but its still convenient to have a full spare. Not that I drove my car with it anyways
Originally Posted by
Troux
Quite different price points.
Eh...yes, but usually no more than 8k-10k. Regardless that is a big difference for two cars of the same name
Originally Posted by
Troux
Trust me, I LOOOOOVE the MK3, but I also know it's far from the best Toyota ever.
Perhaps I'll feel the same way when I finally get this 95 that I've been following for 3-4 years