Thread: just for fun..
View Single Post
Old Aug 15, 2007 | 02:22 PM
  #31 (permalink)  
Figs's Avatar
Figs
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,761
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by EJ20T
Would cheaper in that case mean terrible quality which would then turn to the reliability factor....either way they are both good cars by different aspects...i'm surprised that somebody with a srt-4 hasn't jumped in this thread .
here's an owner! Before getting the SRT-4, I was looking at Evo's... STI's would of been prefered but was out of my wife and I budget. The (2) Evo's I did look at seem to have been ragged on in some way or form. I like Evo's but I rather own an STI. Evo's suck from rolls, if you can launch them correctly they are great from digs. An STI whether dig or roll seems to perform in all aspects.

Although I give the Evo credit because with just a flash, drop-in filter and TBE it runs impressive numbers.

Since this thread is not about the SRT-4, I won't comment on the car. Let's not bring it up because there's been too many threads already in which people have flamed the car.
Reply