View Single Post
Old Mar 13, 2007 | 11:51 AM
  #72 (permalink)  
Nate\'s4.6's Avatar
Nate\'s4.6
Boobs, Beer, & Good Times
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by MtuRbo2
my point is that the v6 mustang is acceptable because its still a mustang either way.

on the other hand putting a v6 in a f-body is almost like putting a v6 in a corvette.

Why is that?

A F-body is filled with just as much platic,rattels, and next to no creature comforts as any mustang on the road.

Only thing that makes the F-body any good is the LS1 or LT1. Think about it. When was the last time you heard any F-body owner talk about how plush his interior was or the extensive list of creature comfort's.

Face it. Shell for shell, comfort for comfort, or anything along those lines. Both the Mustang and the F-body suck.

They are close to the same in everything (as far as comfort and build quality) except for the engine and drive train. Which the LS1 wins hands down. The only thing the Mustang can brag about is the 8.8 rear end out back.

So why would it be worse to put a V6 in either one of them.
__________________
My rides,

95 Ranger , Blurpule, auto 4 cyl.

01 Stang GT, Silver, 5 spd.

A few goodies.

My favorite, Your mom. I love that ride.