View Single Post
Old Mar 13, 2007 | 05:30 AM
  #45 (permalink)  
JonLGT's Avatar
JonLGT
Just for decoration
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,868
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by fastforward
240SXs had rear drive, but never had 210 HP or even close to 240 ft lbs of torque stock. The supercharged Frontiers would be closer, but those were a lot more than 20 grand new. And a Ridgeline is going to cost you more than $20Gs new as well.

For the sake of argument:

Car and Driver Magazine:
3.5 L, V-6 Honda Ridgeline RTS, 5 speed Automatic

0-60
7.90 sec.

1/4 Mile
16.30 sec.

Issue
Jun-05

Top Speed
110.00 mph


...and

Motor Trend Magazine:
4.0 L, V-6, 5 speed Automatic 2006 Mustang Convertible

0-50
5.20 sec.

0-60
7.30 sec.

0-70
9.40 sec.

1/4 Mile
15.50 sec.

60-0 Braking
125.00 ft.

Issue
Aug-06

Skidpad
0.75 g.


And found this...'06 V6 Coupe Mustang: 15.3 @ 91mph
source: 2006 Ford Mustang ('06)

BTW....dumbest comparison EVER!!! haha.

15.5 my ass.
__________________

R.I.P. Brian Nichols 02/07/1989-11/24/2008