View Single Post
Old Aug 24, 2006 | 11:03 AM
  #16 (permalink)  
DJC's Avatar
DJC
Get Some...
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 230
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by hihobibo
I know that the ECU was already dead, but I was saying that this whole denial of warranty work was because the plastic case was removed when the tech looked at it, so if he did accidentally leave it off, the denial was because of his action and not Mastro's tech.
Well yeah, but realistically that wouldn't matter. The ECU was dead BEFORE (anyone) pulled the plastic cover. What is the difference if the OP pulled it versus the master tech? If the denial is solely based on this $6 plastic cover being removed after the fact...then I don't know what to say except that it's utterly ridiculous.

facts based on the OP's letter:
*No record of ECU modding(assumption on my part, i dont know his mods)
*A/C slightly melted but still flowing(can you prove that this line still flows?)
*The Plastic cover WAS present

I don't know.
__________________
No sig.

Last edited by DJC; Aug 24, 2006 at 11:11 AM.
Reply