View Single Post
Old May 16, 2004 | 08:50 PM
  #12 (permalink)  
Goopster1's Avatar
Goopster1
|-Resident LT1 Killer-|
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 7,677
Likes: 0
Default

Originally posted by Epicman
You;re all wrong. What would be better than an electric turbo? There is no loss what so ever. I have it on my Kia and it works. I haven't dynoed it but I must of gotten at least 10 hp.
With a NORMAL turbo there is no loss either u genius...

They both work off of the principle that they use something other than the engines belt to turn the turbine like a supercharger does.

Electric actually does have a loss, its draining your battery that much more therfore making the alternator work more and therefore reducing power to the engine . Turbochargers use exhaust,wasted gas,used material to make power and therefore they do not at all , not even 1 bit, use power to make power.I am sorry, you probably got negative 10 hp from putting that shit on your car man.It couldn't possibly keep up with the airflow of a decently cracked butterly valve in the throttle body.

you= joke!

Last edited by Goopster1; May 16, 2004 at 08:53 PM.
Reply