diamonddog

I hate to point out the obvious but he says its best motor pass it
11.44 @121 ........then shows a slip for a 10.54 @ 137. Yet says no nitrous into the motor. The 60" is better, but not 16mph better


Sweet ride though looks like he did a great job with the work.

st pete chad

1.90 and 1.85 60tf that sucks .i had a full weight 95gt 347 with spray and i was pulling 1.43 60ft on a t-5.he has some type of automatic which he says was build yet the 60ft suck.hell stock i was pulling 1.90 on street tires.not sure the #s add up

riverviewnative

as he said The car gets over 20mpg and goes high 10s on a 100shot.
Back in the day I had a 67 camaro that ran 10:50's at 124 so with the 137 on 100 shot it should be a 9 secend car

riverviewnative

Yea Chad bad suspension on the car kills the 60 foot times

riverviewnative

Quarter Mile 10.06 @ 137 mph
s161.photobucket.com

st pete chad

i had stock suspention.just 90/10 and 50/50 with some 4 banger springs up front.ask harold he knows my old GT.everything else was stock on as for suspention.when the car was bone stock from the factory motor and all i still got 1.90 60ft

harold harper

not jealous,i can build a 10 sec muustang with mostly stock parts.hell look at na306stang.I just don"t like chevy boys calling fords junk.hell go get a 1988 camaro with the same amount of work done to mine and it won"t run half as good.1980-1992 was a joke for chevy there shit boxs couldn"t get out of there own way with a 350 in them.it wasn"t until 1993 when the lt1 came that the 302 mustangs had some competion.even till this day you still can"t beat the power you can get from ford small blocks.
dude has a nice car and not knocking his car. but don"t say runs better because of the chubby motor. its fast but not that damm fast.looks like every other track i see.

st pete chad

jealous? haha my 94gt still had a/c and all full weight and it went 10.6 all day long.a 10sec car is common now.hell i just seen a dodge magnum on past time run 10.07 full weight car with stock tranny.so i dont think i would call a mid 10sec car all that fast...shit if i would have went with a built c4 i could have got the car into the low 10s easy

riverviewnative

well I had that car back in the late 70's and pro stocks were at mid 8's

paintballa213

guys, if you do a search you wll see this car had full suspension on the car with a 200shot when it ran 10.50s @ 137. that motor let go so i put this motor in and took off the suspension/nitrous. youre playing with fire on a 200shot on a stock shortblock and im a fulltime college student with the car in storage. the car runs 11.40-.50s on motor the way it sits right now WITH THE MODS LISTED.