.54 trim vs. 60-1 hifi
Elitist Supra Asshole :)
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,598
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ive said it before, and ill say it again:
50 trim is Pump gas king!
whats the point in getting a huge ass turbo if you wont run more than 17 psi??? its assanine. not to mention, some of those turbos dont get cookin till at least 14 psi, and 17 psi is just gonna give a little taste of how good it can get...
50 trim is Pump gas king!
whats the point in getting a huge ass turbo if you wont run more than 17 psi??? its assanine. not to mention, some of those turbos dont get cookin till at least 14 psi, and 17 psi is just gonna give a little taste of how good it can get...
Guest
Posts: n/a
C|20|\|1c 15 c0|2|23c7. 4|\|d f|20m 3><p3|213|\|c3, 0|\| 4 H0|\|d4 1 c4|\| 73ll y0u 7h3 50 7|21m c4|\||\|07 g3|\|3|2473 400\^/hp 47 16p51. 1 h4v3 533|\| 4 60-1/574g3 5 .82 d0 ju57 7h47 0|\| 4 1.8 l173|2 47 7h47 b0057 l3v3l.
H0p3fully D4v3 \^/1ll m4|\| up 500|\| 4|\|d 5p1|\| 7h053 |20ll3|25 50 \^/3 c4|\| 3|\|d 7h15 d3b473.
H0p3fully D4v3 \^/1ll m4|\| up 500|\| 4|\|d 5p1|\| 7h053 |20ll3|25 50 \^/3 c4|\| 3|\|d 7h15 d3b473.
TR Balla Donor Supreme
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,714
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Vapor
Cronic is correct. And from experience, on a Honda I can tell you the 50 trim cannot generate 400whp at 16psi. I have seen a 60-1/stage 5 .82 do just that on a 1.8 liter at that boost level.
Hopefully Dave will man up soon and spin those rollers so we can end this debate.
Cronic is correct. And from experience, on a Honda I can tell you the 50 trim cannot generate 400whp at 16psi. I have seen a 60-1/stage 5 .82 do just that on a 1.8 liter at that boost level.
Hopefully Dave will man up soon and spin those rollers so we can end this debate.
lets assume 16 psi manifold pressure, with a 1.5 psi intercooler pressure drop, so we have 17.5 psi at the comrepssor outlet which is PR of 2.19 (assume 2.20) . now we go and dig up the compressor map and look at it. at PR 2.20 the 50 trim is capable of ~46lb/min. yeah thats good for over 400 wheel HP. now as to why you dont see this?
A: for some reason Honda people dont seem to like the 50 trim...i dont know why...it is a great compressor for up to 400 hp.
B: when was the last time you saw a 50 trim mated to a stage5 and a .82 A/R? remember the compressor is only half of the system. no one mates 50 trims to .82's because you kill the versatility and low flow capability of the wheel. if you are going to run a .82 you might as well run a 60-1 becuase they will mate up well together. a laggy turbine side mated to a compressor that doesnt like to stay out of the surge region at higher boost/lower flow situations.
I have dynoed a SR20DET to 385 hp to the wheels @ 7500 RPM @ 15 psi on a 50 trim with a stage5 wheel and a .63 A/R turbine side. a .82 housing is good for close to 15 Hp peak over a .63...hrmm not so far fetched now is it?
now the 50 trim is CAPABLE, but it is no where near it's best efficiency points. the 60-1 is a much better match to the 400/16psi mark.
as for 350-360....ehh tossup.
Scott
Guest
Posts: n/a
0k 7h4|\|k y0u c4p741|\| c0mpl373ly 0v3|2 d035 7h3 3><pl4|\|4710|\| 
B451c4lly 7h0ugh, b07h c0uld d0 17, bu7 f0|2 pump g45 |\|umb3|25, 4|\|d \^/17h |23l14b1l17y 1|\| m1|\|d, d3f1|\|473ly 7h3 60-1. 3ff1c13|\|cy d1c74735 7h3 60-1 \^/1ll h4v3 7h3 c00l3|2 ch4|2g3 73mp5, 4|\|d 7hu5 b3 l355 p|20|\|3 70 d370|\|4710|\| f|20m 4|\| 0v3|2 h347 504k3d 1|\|73|2c00l3|2. 4|\|d \^/h3|\| d34l1|\|g \^/17h y0u|2 d41ly d|21v3|2, 7h15 15 0h 50 1mp0|274|\|7.
0h 4|\|d B7\^/, 1 l1k3 7h3 50 7|21m! 1 5p3c 17 f0|2 4 l07 0f p30pl3, 1 \^/45 v3|2y pl3453d \^/17h 7h3 |235ul75 0|\| 4yd1|\|'5 c4|2. 1 \^/1ll b3 m0|23 pl3453d \^/h3|\| 17'5 7u|\|3d
B451c4lly 7h0ugh, b07h c0uld d0 17, bu7 f0|2 pump g45 |\|umb3|25, 4|\|d \^/17h |23l14b1l17y 1|\| m1|\|d, d3f1|\|473ly 7h3 60-1. 3ff1c13|\|cy d1c74735 7h3 60-1 \^/1ll h4v3 7h3 c00l3|2 ch4|2g3 73mp5, 4|\|d 7hu5 b3 l355 p|20|\|3 70 d370|\|4710|\| f|20m 4|\| 0v3|2 h347 504k3d 1|\|73|2c00l3|2. 4|\|d \^/h3|\| d34l1|\|g \^/17h y0u|2 d41ly d|21v3|2, 7h15 15 0h 50 1mp0|274|\|7.
0h 4|\|d B7\^/, 1 l1k3 7h3 50 7|21m! 1 5p3c 17 f0|2 4 l07 0f p30pl3, 1 \^/45 v3|2y pl3453d \^/17h 7h3 |235ul75 0|\| 4yd1|\|'5 c4|2. 1 \^/1ll b3 m0|23 pl3453d \^/h3|\| 17'5 7u|\|3d
4SFED4
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by Enthalpy
A: for some reason Honda people dont seem to like the 50 trim...i dont know why...
A: for some reason Honda people dont seem to like the 50 trim...i dont know why...
I have a friend who made 440+ whp with it. My car isnt too far behind with the same wheel
__________________
Larry
2002 MB C320 Sport Wagon 15.4@91
2002 Dodge Neon SE
1991 Dodge Spirit R/T-12.3@117 (at 368 whp) Now 500 whp / 514 ft lb on pump gas
Larry
2002 MB C320 Sport Wagon 15.4@91
2002 Dodge Neon SE
1991 Dodge Spirit R/T-12.3@117 (at 368 whp) Now 500 whp / 514 ft lb on pump gas
