Photography & Graphics Got a cool photoshop? Need a signature?

Hosting Debate

Thread Tools
 
Old Mar 11, 2008 | 07:55 AM
  #11 (permalink)  
Chris C.'s Avatar
I ♣ Baby Seals.
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,919
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by .:Chris:.

PHOTOBUCKET:
I disagree here. If I didn't care about image quality I'd use a P&S camera. I don't know why everyone makes refrence to the fact that "[we] are not professional photographers." I take my hobbies seriously, don't you? Photobucket negates any sharpening that has been done in photoshop and then some. I do agree that $25 is more than reasonable. That's $2 per month, or two quarters a week... less than a cheeseburger at McDonalds.
I'm not saying you shouldn't have a backup plan. Sometimes I just wanna uplaod a picture, not go through sorting albums, describing photos, tagging, etc. Photobucket is the best one to use if you wanna go quick. There's always a compromise.

Originally Posted by .:Chris:.
Flickr:
Sorry to pick your post apart, but I disagree here too. They've got image quality advantages over most of the competition, but they're geared too much towards their internal community for me to really consider them for hosting per se. I do, however, search their images and read through discussions daily. It's a great resource.
Thats a matter of opinion I guess. I personally like the strong internal community. It's a great way to meet people and study other techniques.

Originally Posted by .:Chris:.
SmugMug:
SmugMug is great for people willing to pay. I dislike the fact that even when you register a domain, your webpage ends up being displayed via their URL (yourdomain.smugmug.com). I'm paying for their service, I shouldn't have to advertise for them too. Their layouts are great for people that don't have the ability to create someting completely unique, but you can usually tell when you're looking at a smugmug page - if you want to stand out from the crowd I don't think this is the way to do it.
I do really enjoy this hobby of mine, but I don't wanna have to pay anymore than I already have (camera & equipment) to go out and take pictures... at least not yet.
__________________



Reply
Old Mar 11, 2008 | 08:09 AM
  #12 (permalink)  
.:Chris:.'s Avatar
Post Deleting Expert.
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,889
Likes: 0
Default

I can see where you're coming from. I like the flickr community/website a lot too, I just hate using it to hose images that I'm going to post elsewhere. Like you said, it's too much work and effort. I upload to my web space via FTP for images that I post here.

I've had web space long before I ever got into photography, so I guess I'm just used to the $10/month that I pay for hosting. It really is invaluable to me.
__________________
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2008 | 08:13 AM
  #13 (permalink)  
Chris C.'s Avatar
I ♣ Baby Seals.
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,919
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by .:Chris:.

I've had web space long before I ever got into photography, so I guess I'm just used to the $10/month that I pay for hosting. It really is invaluable to me.
I've had web space long before also, I just got really lazy or (as I like to think of it) too caught up with school/work/anything-other-than-running-a-site.
__________________



Reply
Old Mar 11, 2008 | 08:20 AM
  #14 (permalink)  
.:Chris:.'s Avatar
Post Deleting Expert.
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,889
Likes: 0
Default



I know how that is. Check out my current (lack of) site... chrismetcalfe.co.uk
__________________
Reply
Old Mar 11, 2008 | 02:22 PM
  #15 (permalink)  
budakinns's Avatar
Thread Starter
Big Black Trucking
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 968
Likes: 0
Default

Lame excuse!
yeah i guess i should change that from to lazy to to picky with what i design. In my eyes what i whip up looks like crap and never use it. Take the DE site im working on. I know that once i finish editing the layout of the site imma think its crap and wont flow right and start designing a new one. Its a habit i have with almost every thing i do. But i have been slacking on that site due to got a few other projects going on atm also.
__________________
Trucking them states
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2008 | 09:31 PM
  #16 (permalink)  
btuner's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,501
Likes: 0
Default

ok i need a free place to host like 100 pics that i just took at a wedding anniversary, i want to be able to give out the website to all the people that attended and let them be able to look at the pics and be able to download them if they want to print them off. should i just create a new flickr account and send everyone there? or does anyone have a better option?
__________________
www.BrandonTurnau.com

Reply
Old Mar 16, 2008 | 11:44 AM
  #17 (permalink)  
CEMAYHALL's Avatar
www.CEMayhall.com
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,070
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Chris C.
Someone said it was?

And wait a sec, shouldn't you be defending SmugMug? Your the one that introduced us to it!
Ha... I dont know who said it was easy!!! It took me over 50 hours to get it to where it is today!!! <~ Thats comming from someone who is HTML illiterate!

After doing it once, I would be able to do it much quicker the next time but still, there is a code for every little thing! <~ I might as-well have created a HTML webpage from scratch!

Originally Posted by .:Chris:.
SmugMug is great for people willing to pay. I dislike the fact that even when you register a domain, your webpage ends up being displayed via their URL (yourdomain.smugmug.com). I'm paying for their service, I shouldn't have to advertise for them too.
Very true but with the Professional Account, you can link your own domain name to your smugmug account! Thats one thing that I did like about it!!! In all reality, once the visitor has typed www.cemayhall.com they probably wont look at the url box again! If they do, they most likely DONT know what smugmug is!

Originally Posted by .:Chris:.
Their layouts are great for people that don't have the ability to create someting completely unique, but you can usually tell when you're looking at a smugmug page - if you want to stand out from the crowd I don't think this is the way to do it.
FYI: If you really wanted to, you are able to use/ create your own layout (ONLY with the professional account!) <~ It takes a lot of HTML knowledge that I dont have. I like the simplicity of my webpage! I think its look professional, VERY easy to navigate/ use, and doesnt confuse visitors (which is what matters the most!)


In My Opinion, Smugmug is a great website but the initial set-up can be very frustrating!!!
__________________


Last edited by CEMAYHALL; Mar 16, 2008 at 11:50 AM.
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2008 | 07:53 PM
  #18 (permalink)  
budakinns's Avatar
Thread Starter
Big Black Trucking
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 968
Likes: 0
Default

yeah after a good minute of thinking it over im just going to buy a server and design our own shit. gonna be the same price as smugmug every year with a domain and email accounts. Like i said only problem i have when making sites is i dont like the end project and scrap em.
__________________
Trucking them states
Reply




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:57 PM.