Bordom day pics
Heavy Artillery Co.
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 6,811
Likes: 0
www.CEMayhall.com
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,070
Likes: 0
You should get a UV Lens Filter... It will cut out your sun spots (located on pic #5) and they arent expensive either (unlike the majority of Camera parts.)
Pics still look
.
Pics still look
.
__________________
Thread Starter
MAXED REP CLUB
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 4,017
Likes: 0
haha i love my camera and photography, i take pics all day long haha, and yea ima get a lens cap pic all the time
__________________
Post Deleting Expert.
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,889
Likes: 0
I tend to disagree. Digital Cameras (CCD's) are generally not sensitive to UV light.
From Filter options for digital cameras
More on flare from filters here. As this article says, I use UV filters like lens caps. Once I'm ready to shoot... they come off. 
From Filter options for digital cameras
By definition, your eyes can't see UV, but ordinary film can, and many CCDs can as well, although to a much lesser extent than film. In theory, there's something to be gained by filtering UV out of the picture. Due to the very short wavelengths involved (below 400 nm), the UV band carries more than its fair share of atmospheric scatter. Scattered UV light can cloud distant backgrounds and impart an unwelcome bluish cast in film images. UV contamination tends to be most problematic at very high altitudes (well over 10,000 feet) and over long stretches of water.
So much for theory. In practice, these theoretical UV filter benefits simply don't show up on the digital side. Under nearly all conditions and for nearly all cameras, UV filters are a waste of money and a potential source of flare for digital photographers.
So much for theory. In practice, these theoretical UV filter benefits simply don't show up on the digital side. Under nearly all conditions and for nearly all cameras, UV filters are a waste of money and a potential source of flare for digital photographers.
__________________
