Hdr
Thankyouverymuch, sir.
I know the theory. I just don't really care for HDR most of the time. I find that I'd rather take the exposures and cut/copy/paste in photoshop without the help of an HDR processor. HDR pictures are generally plauged by halo's around any areas of large contrast, and that's easier to limit when I'm not working with an HDR processor.
Anyway, here's an HDR I processed with photomatix. It's good, but I prefer my original:
I know the theory. I just don't really care for HDR most of the time. I find that I'd rather take the exposures and cut/copy/paste in photoshop without the help of an HDR processor. HDR pictures are generally plauged by halo's around any areas of large contrast, and that's easier to limit when I'm not working with an HDR processor.
Anyway, here's an HDR I processed with photomatix. It's good, but I prefer my original:
So I want to get a setting with a big dynamic range for it to work right, right? So at dusk, dawn or an overcast day would be ideal? I have a point and shoot camera that goes from -2 to +2 s I can get some variation on exposures. I'll give it some work this weekend if I like anything I'll post it up. You guys should get side jobs as photography/photoshop teachers.
__________________
Originally Posted by Dwight
Reject a woman, and she will never let it go. One of the many defects of their kind. Also, weak arms.



