Mitsubishi Tech AWD and all things DSM Central

1g manifold

Thread Tools
 
Old Sep 6, 2004 | 12:56 PM
  #1 (permalink)  
NT_Hardcore's Avatar
Thread Starter
bassheadsent.net
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,281
Likes: 0
Default 1g manifold

will a 1g manifold bolt up to a 2g? will this work at least as well as the 2g manifold?
__________________
http://www.bassheadsent.net/
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2004 | 01:49 PM
  #2 (permalink)  
Jordan Y.'s Avatar
15 seconds EXHILARATION
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 7,801
Likes: 0
Default

1g manifold is a downgrade for a 2g. If you want to upgrade, get another 2g manifold and port it, get an Evo 3 manifold and port it- though Mitsu supposedly hiked the prices on them recently so it's not as economical as it once was, or get the Slowboyracing manifold that's just a bit more than an Evo manifold and comes cast in fully ported form.
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2004 | 03:05 PM
  #3 (permalink)  
mikeyees13's Avatar
now with more protein
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,027
Likes: 0
Default

I agree, as long as your talking about Exhaust manifolds.
No one specified which manifold we are disscussing.
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2004 | 07:02 PM
  #4 (permalink)  
NT_Hardcore's Avatar
Thread Starter
bassheadsent.net
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,281
Likes: 0
Default

im sorry i ment exhaust
__________________
http://www.bassheadsent.net/
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2004 | 09:00 PM
  #5 (permalink)  
EvilGSX's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Default

They mean exhaust too. I have a 2G manifold if you need one!
2G is way better!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2004 | 12:47 PM
  #6 (permalink)  
Jordan Y.'s Avatar
15 seconds EXHILARATION
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 7,801
Likes: 0
Default

Originally posted by mikeyees13
I agree, as long as your talking about Exhaust manifolds.
No one specified which manifold we are disscussing.
You're right, I just assumed he was talking about exhaust manifolds. The 1g intake manifold+porting the head to match is considered an upgrade by some, though others argue that the 1g ports are too big.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2004 | 06:19 PM
  #7 (permalink)  
mikeyees13's Avatar
now with more protein
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,027
Likes: 0
Default

Yep, supposedly the 1g intake is designed for better flow.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2004 | 08:23 AM
  #8 (permalink)  
Ian MMF's Avatar
Omnipotence
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,843
Likes: 0
Default

Best combo is a 1g intake mani with a 2g(ported)/evoIII(ported) exhaust mani. Then you gotta worry about exhaust, yay.
Reply
Old Sep 13, 2004 | 08:27 AM
  #9 (permalink)  
Chris LS's Avatar
just blaze...
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,298
Likes: 0
Default

Originally posted by 4drwhore
2g(ported)/evoIII(ported) exhaust mani.
Which of the two would you rather have? Just curious.
__________________
Quote : I'm Slow:
Less hours = less $$. Less repetitive 'ish every day = PRICELESS!

Reply
Old Sep 13, 2004 | 08:37 AM
  #10 (permalink)  
Ian MMF's Avatar
Omnipotence
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,843
Likes: 0
Default

I'm not sure if there is a major difference but on my galant I had a FP evoIII ported exhaust manifold.

http://linux.forcedperformance.net/m...de=DSM-Exhaust

From what I have seen people are pretty much doing the same thing with a ported 2g as people with a ported evoIII with similar setups. I got the evoIII because it came as a whole setup when I bought a fp green off of a car. If I was going budget I'd probably just do a ported 2g. Probably not worth the money for the extra little bang you would get out of an evoIII. But I have no experience with ported 2g mani's at all so most of my reasons/arguements are one sided.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:07 PM.