If they advertised their dyno read like a dynojet then yes you would be correct, BUT here's the key so please try and keep your eyes on the most important point, they advertise their Mustang dyno to read 12-15% lower then a dynojet so what your trying to propose doesn't apply to this discussion.

 

It probably would which would be grossly over corrected. That is why Scott turned off the weather station on his dyno. It was over correcting which caused a big huff on Evom on accusations that Scott was purposely manipulating the numbers. Once the weather correction was turned off the results fell much more in line.

 

yes all correct, where did FBI say their dyno reads low???

 

This goes back to before you even entered the Evo scene. Matt at FBI, formerly full throttle, claimed this dyno to read like a Mustang should. About 15% lower then. a dynojet andade multiple digs at TTP about it reading much lower then theirs. matt's personal car trapped upper 120's at the track while only making 380ish whp on this exact dyno. The moment it was brought to FBI it started reading monsterous power. I wonder why.....

 

I am interested in seeing some of the numbers from the Titan Dyno. Hopefully they will post the dyno sheets. People words lately are worth shit. PAPER is fact.

 

I'm hearing the ten just made 660 on race gas

 

stop playing X

 

I'm not check a FaceBook status of a mutual friend they have in common with us.

 

660whp (not sure if Uncorrected, SAE or STD) but they had issues

 

Issues like what, some one else entering the info into the dyno cpu