Quick question...

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Oct 29, 2002 | 07:29 AM

#11 (permalink)

Cronic

Guest

Posts: n/a

I know I know.. bah.

Oct 29, 2002 | 07:43 AM

#12 (permalink)

Bill

Livin' in Seattle

Joined: Nov 2000

Posts: 2,813

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally posted by "CXHatchback"

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bill

Weight/HP

Lower is better.

Yeah but he said power to weight ratio which is HP/Weight, in which case higher is better.

Yes but his results (11.125 & 12.317) didn't reflect the product one would get using power/weight so I assumed he meant weight/power (weight to power ratio). Bleh, it's all relative.

Oct 29, 2002 | 10:10 AM

#13 (permalink)

Cronic

Guest

Posts: n/a

You guys knew what I was talking about.
And if someone had 11hp per lbs. I would be VERY impressed.

Oct 29, 2002 | 10:30 AM

#14 (permalink)

m0nk3y

pwns.

Joined: Nov 2000

Posts: 12,937

Likes: 0

Quote:

Originally posted by "CronicBurn"

You guys knew what I was talking about.
And if someone had 11hp per lbs. I would be VERY impressed.

and, theyd probably be VERY dead.

__________________

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lil Ze

Florida is the new Miami through and through.

Reply Subscribe

Reply Share

First
Prev
2 / 2
Next
Last