i have a 1996 integra ls with blades however i seen a completely stock 1994 integra gsr lastnight and spoke with the guy (looked like he was in his mid 40's) lol shocker. that being said his gsr was completely stock and he pulled next to my car to talk and i noticed that his was lower to the ground with stock suspension. i know supposingly there isnt any difference with the suspension from ls to gsr but when i check acuras part page the shocks are different price for 1994 gsr compared to a 1996 ls/gsr, also according to New Cars, Used Cars, Car Reviews and Pricing - Edmunds.com the ground clearance on the '94 is 4.3 verses 5.9 on the later years. so my question is whats the difference between 1994 gsr suspension and 1996 ls suspension.

 

could have had somethin to do with tire profile and how many miles were on each car. springs will sack out over time and sag low.

 

he had the same tire profile as mine 195/55/15. he had the fat fives and i had the blades on 195/55/15. he had around the same amount of mileage on his 1994 that i had on my '96

 

his was prolly beat on more. maybe the bushings were shot on his.

 

yea well i beat on mine also and i havent replaced anything that envolves the suspension and thesuspension is stock with factory parts at 145,xxx mi.

 

acuraoemparts.com will show you the Integra has different factory springs on some models..

 

^^ +1. the spring rates may be different too.

 

well i want the spring rate that the 1994 gsr has cause its lower and factory height looked good on his gsr