Got Low in a hurry
Did a spring swap on a friends 94 Integra the other night and once i got the hang of the whole setup it was extremly easy Im talking really easy for me. Now what i want to know if anyone can answer this for me is why did Honda decide to go with the McPherson Strut design instead of sticking with the older style like on the Integra can ayone answer this or is it one of those unknown Honda type trivia things.
MacPherson strut
The Macpherson strut is a type of car suspension system widely used in modern vehicles. It can be used for both front and rear suspensions, but is usually found at the front, where it provides a steering pivot (kingpin) as well as a suspension mounting for the wheel.
It consists of a small subframe or arm at the bottom which provides a bottom mounting point for the hub or axle of the wheel. This subframe provides both lateral and longitudinal location of the wheel. The upper part of the hub is fixed to the strut proper, which extends upwards directly to a mounting in the body shell of the vehicle. This type of suspension is only applicable to monocoque (unitary) body construction. The strut will usually carry both the coil spring on which the body is suspended and the shock absorber, which is usually in the form of a cartridge mounted within the strut. The strut also usually has a steering arm built in. It is because the whole assembly is very simple and can be preassembled into a unit that is has become almost ubiquitous with manufacturers. In addition to its simplicity and lower cost, it has few vices in respect of handling. Its only real drawback is that it tends to transmit noise and vibration from the road directly into the body shell, giving higher noise levels and a "hard" feeling to the ride compared with systems such as double wishbones.
The Macpherson strut is a type of car suspension system widely used in modern vehicles. It can be used for both front and rear suspensions, but is usually found at the front, where it provides a steering pivot (kingpin) as well as a suspension mounting for the wheel.
It consists of a small subframe or arm at the bottom which provides a bottom mounting point for the hub or axle of the wheel. This subframe provides both lateral and longitudinal location of the wheel. The upper part of the hub is fixed to the strut proper, which extends upwards directly to a mounting in the body shell of the vehicle. This type of suspension is only applicable to monocoque (unitary) body construction. The strut will usually carry both the coil spring on which the body is suspended and the shock absorber, which is usually in the form of a cartridge mounted within the strut. The strut also usually has a steering arm built in. It is because the whole assembly is very simple and can be preassembled into a unit that is has become almost ubiquitous with manufacturers. In addition to its simplicity and lower cost, it has few vices in respect of handling. Its only real drawback is that it tends to transmit noise and vibration from the road directly into the body shell, giving higher noise levels and a "hard" feeling to the ride compared with systems such as double wishbones.
exactly and i never noticed a difference between the rife quality of the teg and my 01 civic it just seems like the integra system is a hell of a lot easier to work on. Just my opinion.
Yeah i know all about the design i have been working with the McPherson style for a long time. The reasoning behind it doesnt really make any sense to me. It just seems the older teg style would be easier to maintain. I guess they just figuered the mcphersons were chaper to assemble i suppose DAMN CHEAP BASTARDS


