Syclone goes 9.84@143.6mph
Originally posted by Fordified
Yeah, I saw an article on this truck in the new GMHTP at Barnes and Noble a bit ago. Very impressive. Usually those things are lumps.
Yeah, I saw an article on this truck in the new GMHTP at Barnes and Noble a bit ago. Very impressive. Usually those things are lumps.
Fordified, next time your cruising orlando, i'll show you a lump.
*coughIGNORANTcough*
moving on...
just some FYI, that record has been broken. Robert, known as Mr. Syclone busted a 9.78@142 over in Sweden, still AWD.
Close behind him is Mike B in Michigan who edged out and tied Robert's last record of 9.84@141, still AWD
*coughIGNORANTcough* moving on...
just some FYI, that record has been broken. Robert, known as Mr. Syclone busted a 9.78@142 over in Sweden, still AWD.
Close behind him is Mike B in Michigan who edged out and tied Robert's last record of 9.84@141, still AWD
__________________
adam
91 syclone #237
92 typhoon #1181
GMC Typhoon 1011 - sold
GMC Typhoon 0366 - sold
F.A.S.T.
SyTy.net - Administrator
adam
91 syclone #237
92 typhoon #1181
GMC Typhoon 1011 - sold
GMC Typhoon 0366 - sold
F.A.S.T.
SyTy.net - Administrator
Guest
Posts: n/a
True, 13's bone stock, but lets face it, the engines are fragile, the drivetrain is fragile, and there really aren't a great deal of fast ones.
Hell, when did they quit building them? 92 or 93? Its taken 11 years to get one into single digit ET's? Mustangs are running low 6's, GN's running low 7's, Camaro's running low 8's.
I'm not flaming them, lord knows they are neat, but they just aren't brutally fast, they are outrageously expensive to buy, maintain, and modify, and they are fragile.
I'm not a Ford sack swinger thats trolling for trouble, I appreciate anything that looks good and/or is fast, just stating my opionion of the sy/ty's.
Hell, when did they quit building them? 92 or 93? Its taken 11 years to get one into single digit ET's? Mustangs are running low 6's, GN's running low 7's, Camaro's running low 8's.
I'm not flaming them, lord knows they are neat, but they just aren't brutally fast, they are outrageously expensive to buy, maintain, and modify, and they are fragile.
I'm not a Ford sack swinger thats trolling for trouble, I appreciate anything that looks good and/or is fast, just stating my opionion of the sy/ty's.
Last edited by Fordified; Sep 17, 2004 at 12:26 PM.
Originally posted by Fordified
True, 13's bone stock, but lets face it, the engines are fragile, the drivetrain is fragile, and there really aren't a great deal of fast ones.
Hell, when did they quit building them? 92 or 93? Its taken 11 years to get one into single digit ET's? Mustangs are running low 6's, GN's running low 7's, Camaro's running low 8's.
True, 13's bone stock, but lets face it, the engines are fragile, the drivetrain is fragile, and there really aren't a great deal of fast ones.
Hell, when did they quit building them? 92 or 93? Its taken 11 years to get one into single digit ET's? Mustangs are running low 6's, GN's running low 7's, Camaro's running low 8's.
Roughly 7,000 Trucks total EVER were made over the course of three years.
How many and how long have Camaro's, GN's, Stangs etc been around for people to mod and tinker with?



