Dyno Sheets for those who care
Guest
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Originally posted by cali
So whatcha gotta say Porshe dude?
So whatcha gotta say Porshe dude?
My FI and mechanical problems will be a distant memory once my project is complete.
Guest
Posts: n/a
I havent seen a plot of a stock SRT4, but you gotta remember those things have a long stroke engine.. thats how it makes those torque numbers! Long stroke engines also fall off big time as the revs increase. 4500 does seem a little too low however
Also Cali.. the electronics in those cars were made so you couldnt use a grainger or other boost controls. Its not as basic as the older TDs. Garry McKissick (one of the big engine designers of the SRT4) told us back a few yrs ago that it'll be hard to fool the ECU with its much more advanced programs and many different points of retrieving info. Yeah, you might be getting the boost up a little more... but look how its running!
It also might be the computer fighting the engine's responses to the MBC since it works on TQ goals, not max boost levels
dunno..
Also Cali.. the electronics in those cars were made so you couldnt use a grainger or other boost controls. Its not as basic as the older TDs. Garry McKissick (one of the big engine designers of the SRT4) told us back a few yrs ago that it'll be hard to fool the ECU with its much more advanced programs and many different points of retrieving info. Yeah, you might be getting the boost up a little more... but look how its running!
It also might be the computer fighting the engine's responses to the MBC since it works on TQ goals, not max boost levels
dunno..
Thread Starter
Skittle on crack!
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,584
Likes: 0
Originally posted by FearThe4Doors
I havent seen a plot of a stock SRT4, but you gotta remember those things have a long stroke engine.. thats how it makes those torque numbers! Long stroke engines also fall off big time as the revs increase. 4500 does seem a little too low however
Also Cali.. the electronics in those cars were made so you couldnt use a grainger or other boost controls. Its not as basic as the older TDs. Garry McKissick (one of the big engine designers of the SRT4) told us back a few yrs ago that it'll be hard to fool the ECU with its much more advanced programs and many different points of retrieving info. Yeah, you might be getting the boost up a little more... but look how its running!
It also might be the computer fighting the engine's responses to the MBC since it works on TQ goals, not max boost levels
dunno..
I havent seen a plot of a stock SRT4, but you gotta remember those things have a long stroke engine.. thats how it makes those torque numbers! Long stroke engines also fall off big time as the revs increase. 4500 does seem a little too low however
Also Cali.. the electronics in those cars were made so you couldnt use a grainger or other boost controls. Its not as basic as the older TDs. Garry McKissick (one of the big engine designers of the SRT4) told us back a few yrs ago that it'll be hard to fool the ECU with its much more advanced programs and many different points of retrieving info. Yeah, you might be getting the boost up a little more... but look how its running!
It also might be the computer fighting the engine's responses to the MBC since it works on TQ goals, not max boost levels
dunno..
The reason was , bc I had the car running higher boost, the ECU was trying to drop it to what it *should be*, and by me taking the mod off...if droped back fomr 15 to 12. Once I reset the ECU, it came right back to 15.
Trust me when I say I am the least bit worried about the 930 look alike pull. All I need is an hour or two and it will be all sorted out.
I just had to make sure, my car would take mods, bc there is one other guy who will not make anyting above 215HP, 12PSI or 17PSI
.With my original problems, I just need to be confident all is well.
Billy, I be coming for u soon
__________________
You can quit watching me now....
You can quit watching me now....
Last edited by cali; Jun 11, 2003 at 08:34 PM.
Devils advocate
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,343
Likes: 0
Originally posted by Billy
Not a problem...good thing I didn't plan on resting on my laurels
Not a problem...good thing I didn't plan on resting on my laurels
Laurels?
When did you get laurels? Next thing you will be saying you have accolades too.
__________________
98 Z28 A4/LS1
Sport Gold Metalic
God I Hate Ricers
98 Z28 A4/LS1
Sport Gold Metalic
God I Hate Ricers
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by FearThe4Doors
I havent seen a plot of a stock SRT4, but you gotta remember those things have a long stroke engine.. thats how it makes those torque numbers! Long stroke engines also fall off big time as the revs increase. 4500 does seem a little too low however
Also Cali.. the electronics in those cars were made so you couldnt use a grainger or other boost controls. Its not as basic as the older TDs. Garry McKissick (one of the big engine designers of the SRT4) told us back a few yrs ago that it'll be hard to fool the ECU with its much more advanced programs and many different points of retrieving info. Yeah, you might be getting the boost up a little more... but look how its running!
It also might be the computer fighting the engine's responses to the MBC since it works on TQ goals, not max boost levels
dunno..
I havent seen a plot of a stock SRT4, but you gotta remember those things have a long stroke engine.. thats how it makes those torque numbers! Long stroke engines also fall off big time as the revs increase. 4500 does seem a little too low however
Also Cali.. the electronics in those cars were made so you couldnt use a grainger or other boost controls. Its not as basic as the older TDs. Garry McKissick (one of the big engine designers of the SRT4) told us back a few yrs ago that it'll be hard to fool the ECU with its much more advanced programs and many different points of retrieving info. Yeah, you might be getting the boost up a little more... but look how its running!
It also might be the computer fighting the engine's responses to the MBC since it works on TQ goals, not max boost levels
dunno..
Ding Ding Ding we have a winner!
