General Car Chat Talk about cars in general. All makes and models - strictly car discussion.

camaro 35th anniversary

Thread Tools
 
Old Feb 17, 2010 | 02:32 PM
  #21 (permalink)  
markzeronine's Avatar
Mark G
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 11,192
Likes: 0
Default

I mean it was designed in the early 90's, compare apples to apples and japanese shit isn't any better

Reply
Old Feb 17, 2010 | 02:40 PM
  #22 (permalink)  
K20A2's Avatar
OH LAWD JESUS ITS A FIRE!
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 13,977
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by neondriver
in the day that car was awsome and still is. its a sports car not luxry car. definately agree i think the interiors are cheezy.....but then again your on tr, theyll tell you to gut it and put in 1 racing seat with a roll cage even though its stock.
I've never seen anyone offer that sort of advice, the false image you have of TR is hilarious.
__________________
"You can always count on the Americans to do the right thing - after they have tried everything else."

-Winston Churchill
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2010 | 04:37 PM
  #23 (permalink)  
neondriver's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,552
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by K20A2
I've never seen anyone offer that sort of advice, the false image you have of TR is hilarious.

really? i have. have you seen the bogus retarted things people post? theres a handful with decent opinions but most are smart enough now to not really say anything....look a few post down someone wants us to better "rep fl on youtube" with our vids...lol..look at 1/2 nissan tech most cars are 1/4 finished and dented from drifting(granetd some have nice motor builds)...
-as far as your purchase id go for it, in 10-15-20 years it will still have value while the modded honda's will be long in the junk yard and wont have a value (even though tyes currently theey hold the resale values but in long term i dont see it happening.)
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2010 | 04:39 PM
  #24 (permalink)  
FoxHondaRider's Avatar
Registered Hater
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 3,246
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by neondriver
in the day that car was awsome and still is. its a sports car not luxry car. definately agree i think the interiors are cheezy.....but then again your on tr, theyll tell you to gut it and put in 1 racing seat with a roll cage even though its stock.
Its a sports car with body roll and wheel gap. Dont forget the seats that if you attempted to pull a G you would end up sitting on the armrest. A big sporty bubble looking thing? Noice
__________________
Originally Posted by *JamReX*
The only thing worse than fucking ricers, VW .... who think theyre style is somehow supreme to all others.

Honda builds go from yay to gay in the matter of a K.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2010 | 05:19 PM
  #25 (permalink)  
LuckyH's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,507
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by markzeronine
I mean it was designed in the early 90's, compare apples to apples and japanese shit isn't any better
Okay lets compare here.

1994 Camaro


2002 Camaro



1994 Integra


2002 RSX


Shit ford didn't do any better

1994 Mustang


2004 Mustang


I don't think anyone wants to purchase a car with an outdated interior. It's where you spend most of your time, so it should have a large impact on what vehicle you purchase.
__________________

Last edited by LuckyH; Feb 17, 2010 at 05:25 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 17, 2010 | 05:46 PM
  #26 (permalink)  
rotarykidd's Avatar
ROTM February 2013
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,351
Likes: 0
Default

god damn it k20a2, stfu and gtfo of this thread. why you hatin on the mullet madness?


btw, i hate the interior on these, but the ls1 is an amazing engine. the heads are paper light (even though they crack more than any other head), the blocks are aluminium too iirc, and they produce some good power. they weigh less than a 13b will all the fixins'
__________________
__________________


Reply
Old Feb 17, 2010 | 06:20 PM
  #27 (permalink)  
markzeronine's Avatar
Mark G
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 11,192
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by LuckyH
Okay lets compare here.

.
the integra to rsx is a completely redesigned car.

the mustang was a mid model change, and the camaro never really changed at all.

to be fair you'd have to compare the rsx to a 05 mustang or current camaro lol

idc i wouldn't buy another one of any again anyway.. and I had a 98 camaro, 96 mustang, 95 integra, 92 civic, 05 rsx bla bla bla

just saying
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2010 | 01:11 AM
  #28 (permalink)  
Sippi's Avatar
Mitsu SON!!!
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,576
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by SayWhaa?
why not invest in the money and make profit?

cuz he's an american and we don't do crazy things like that lol
__________________
Reply
Old Feb 18, 2010 | 07:43 AM
  #29 (permalink)  
neondriver's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 2,552
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by LuckyH
Okay lets compare here.

1994 Camaro


2002 Camaro



1994 Integra


2002 RSX


Shit ford didn't do any better

1994 Mustang


2004 Mustang


I don't think anyone wants to purchase a car with an outdated interior. It's where you spend most of your time, so it should have a large impact on what vehicle you purchase.

true. which is why my dd is a 04 altima the interiors are verry comfortable, quiet and decently nice. I keep the inside of my car spotless and just got new nismo floormats because mine were kinda dirty and always bought anything i needed from the dealer to keep it like new (where as my other cars id buy used, cheap aftermarket etc.)...... and yet havent washed the outside in over a month...... but even with that, the brand new ones have a much nicer interior. my camaro/truck/bike is just another thing to play with i wouldnt want any of those to be my only vehicle or daily driver.
Reply




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:27 PM.