Apparently we are the only ones that get this.

 

just needs some chrome and wood panels!

 

so ur saying just b/c its a honda it cant be show quality?? wow makes alot of sense.

im sure back in 67 ur car was considering a "economy" car

but how do u know its not show quality? have u seen the car in person? i didnt think so u really dont know wtf ur talking about.

i dont like hondas but its not rice, its different thats for sure but not rice. I like how when ppl started to disagree w/ u, u got all offensive and started bashing ppl.

 

Wheat?? up until now I have been with you.. Now I am lost..

 

how do u know its not real? maybe its airbrushed?

 

Okay, first off, you're an idiot. I'm saying because it's a '96 Accord it's not a show car. If it was an Acura NSX, well, we wouldn't be having this discussion, mostly because an NSX owner wouldn't do that ugly ass shit to his car.

Second, never, under any circumstances, is a '67 Camaro SS considered an economy car. Period. You can't even begin to argue that.

 

it's actually a rice field, but yeah i'm sure i can find a better picture

 

If you read the description, you'd see it's paint. That's fake.

 

holy shit.... Did you just call a 1967 Camaro SS a Econo Car???? Wow your mom drank alot when she was pregnant.

 

i didnt know it was a camaro but i honestly dont care, just b/c something is idifferent u attack it likes it going to kill ur children or something.

but lets see we are talknig about a car starting off stock for like 5k to one that starts off at like 50k, so how can u even compare those 2? u cant, so YOU stop being a dumb fuck and chill out