General Car Chat Talk about cars in general. All makes and models - strictly car discussion.

Woohoo... Compare your MPG to new standards!!!

Thread Tools
 
Old Jun 7, 2007 | 07:57 AM
  #11 (permalink)  
John's Avatar
lol @ tampa
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 41,257
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by _Charles_

2007 Prius stated 60 city and 51 hwy, and 55 combined
2008 Prius states 48 city and 45 hwy, and 46 combined
What a bunch of crap. My 90 CRX HF got 48 combined with my right foot on the floor pretty much anytime the car was not stopped. Yes, this dinky little 1.5 liter, non hybrid, non direct injection, 180k + miles on the motor, that I paid 1500 bucks for, out sipped the Prius, a car that costs over 10x as much. You wanna know the culprit - safety regulations!

All those safety ninnies have added so much weight to cars with their 10 airbags, anti lock braking systems, side impact door beams, etc etc etc, make the Prius weigh almost 3000lbs - as much as my Evo! Meanwhile, my rinky dink CRX tipped the scales at a mighty 1961 lbs, maybe a tad more after I +1 the wheels to 14' HX wheels and 86'd the stock seats in favor of Recaro made seats from the Si model

All the technology in the world cannot beat physics. You can improve how efficiently you make the power, or you can reduce the weight being moved. Which do you think is easier?

(sorry, my rant for the day)
__________________
2008 AW 335xi coupe - Dinan stage 2 - DCI - Dinan axle back

|Full color business cards||flyers||postcards||more|
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2007 | 08:39 AM
  #12 (permalink)  
Brownsound's Avatar
Dude.. thats awesome.
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 435
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by John
What a bunch of crap. My 90 CRX HF got 48 combined with my right foot on the floor pretty much anytime the car was not stopped. Yes, this dinky little 1.5 liter, non hybrid, non direct injection, 180k + miles on the motor, that I paid 1500 bucks for, out sipped the Prius, a car that costs over 10x as much. You wanna know the culprit - safety regulations!

All those safety ninnies have added so much weight to cars with their 10 airbags, anti lock braking systems, side impact door beams, etc etc etc, make the Prius weigh almost 3000lbs - as much as my Evo! Meanwhile, my rinky dink CRX tipped the scales at a mighty 1961 lbs, maybe a tad more after I +1 the wheels to 14' HX wheels and 86'd the stock seats in favor of Recaro made seats from the Si model

All the technology in the world cannot beat physics. You can improve how efficiently you make the power, or you can reduce the weight being moved. Which do you think is easier?

(sorry, my rant for the day)
+1 cars are WAY too heavy and they keep going up and up and up! SIXTEEN STANDARD AIRBAGS!? Give me a break..
__________________
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2007 | 08:58 AM
  #13 (permalink)  
Chuck 98 RT/10's Avatar
Sexist
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 21,091
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Enigma97
So now the EPA is running around saying, "WE CAUGHT YOU, TOYOTA!"
Dunno how much bragging the EPA can do. The EPA sets the rules and the manufacturers have to adhere to them.
__________________
Chuck
www.BabelMotorsports.net
www.SAFEMotorsports.com
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2007 | 09:00 AM
  #14 (permalink)  
Chuck 98 RT/10's Avatar
Sexist
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 21,091
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by John
All those safety ninnies have added so much weight to cars with their 10 airbags, anti lock braking systems, side impact door beams, etc etc etc, make the Prius weigh almost 3000lbs - as much as my Evo! Meanwhile, my rinky dink CRX tipped the scales at a mighty 1961 lbs, maybe a tad more after I +1 the wheels to 14' HX wheels and 86'd the stock seats in favor of Recaro made seats from the Si model
An excellent observation. Those safety nannies also stifle a lot of creativity.
__________________
Chuck
www.BabelMotorsports.net
www.SAFEMotorsports.com
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2007 | 11:07 AM
  #15 (permalink)  
_Charles_'s Avatar
Thread Starter
formerly 'RiceRocket'
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 5,691
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by CanTheWhales
Does it really matter to old car what the new standard... they don't even have the info for your 53 caddy, so this seems irrelavant to your budget...
The 53 is the weekend car. I average 35,000-40,000 miles A YEAR in my Daily Driver. I gave the 4Runner (17mpg, 93 octane) to the wife and bought the new Camry SE V6 (25mpg so far, 87 octane).

@ 35k miles (4Runner) = $6691/yr Gas
@ 35k miles (Camry V6) = $4200/yr Gas

So...I'm saving $2500/yr on gas.
Nothing irrelavant there, don't ya think

Charles
__________________


1953 Cadillac Coupe De Ville (Fuel Injected, Drive-by-wire, DoD)
2009 Pontiac G8 GT (6.0l V8 Sleeper)
2011 Toyota Sequoia Sport 4x4 (Tow Rig)
My Blog: www.HotRodCaddy.com
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2007 | 11:31 AM
  #16 (permalink)  
martz0r's Avatar
 
Joined: May 1974
Posts: 6,378
Likes: 0
Default

For me the average was about right with the old standards... I got 330 miles last week's tank (18 gal) which = 18.3mpg and the old standard rating was 19mpg city, which is about right considering the miles on my car and I DO smash the throttle a lot.
__________________


Reply
Old Jun 7, 2007 | 11:46 AM
  #17 (permalink)  
Hostetler's Avatar
'MERICA!
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,765
Likes: 0
Default

yeah the new mpg is about right for my xa. before it was 32-37 now its 27-34.
__________________
Ban Senor Honda
Reply
Old Jun 7, 2007 | 11:59 AM
  #18 (permalink)  
aaron1017's Avatar
is not Rotarded anymore!
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,128
Likes: 0
Default

I think the new ratings are a much better measure of real world driving. Don't see why people are complaining.
__________________
LS1/T56 Heads Cam 1994 FD
Reply




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:52 AM.