General Car Chat Talk about cars in general. All makes and models - strictly car discussion.

Funniest thing I have ever seen

Thread Tools
 
Old Feb 25, 2006 | 10:54 AM
  #71 (permalink)  
Figs's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,761
Likes: 0
Default

Alright here's 5 I made real quick...





Reply
Old Feb 27, 2006 | 05:52 AM
  #72 (permalink)  
YBlegal's Avatar
Broke not Built
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 8,730
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by canyouheminow
Well it's like this, thursday at bradenton I saw this. 2 supras running, I know a surprise in itself to see, they had at least a minimum of $30-$35k invested in their cars with drag radials and spray turning 12.3's @ 120mph (which is by no means slow) , then a blue skittle with about $22k-$24k invested in it with slicks on turning 12.7's @107mph. So you figure you spend a little more to be getting 10's, and tell me my statement doesn't carry some truth to it. Now I'm only stating the comparisson of money spent to go fast, if it was a looks competition the Supra wins it hands down, or even getting laid factor again supra wins it hands down, or long-gevity or parts lasting again the supra.
wow.....my $1200 integra runs 13.0 @ 108mph on DRAG RADIALS so what does that have to do with how much money is spent, when you refer to the neon and supra....unless your tryin to say that honda OWNS both.....

a lil bit more money and slicks and my car could run 11's
__________________
working my way back up...





Originally Posted by JoKiE crx4294
What do i have to prove to anyone?....umm NOTHING!!
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2006 | 06:45 AM
  #73 (permalink)  
MtuRbo2's Avatar
sergee-hoe
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,739
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by canyouheminow
Well it's like this, thursday at bradenton I saw this. 2 supras running, I know a surprise in itself to see, they had at least a minimum of $30-$35k invested in their cars with drag radials and spray turning 12.3's @ 120mph (which is by no means slow) , then a blue skittle with about $22k-$24k invested in it with slicks on turning 12.7's @107mph. So you figure you spend a little more to be getting 10's, and tell me my statement doesn't carry some truth to it. Now I'm only stating the comparisson of money spent to go fast, if it was a looks competition the Supra wins it hands down, or even getting laid factor again supra wins it hands down, or long-gevity or parts lasting again the supra.
you are contradicting yourself...i dont understand how the skittle would cost less money if the supra was more reliable. wouldnt the skittle end up costing a lot more in the long run?
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2006 | 07:33 AM
  #74 (permalink)  
YBlegal's Avatar
Broke not Built
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 8,730
Likes: 0
Default

that and the fact of all this was refering to the pic. that he made saying "SUPRA, all that money spent only to get beat by a $30,000 NEON" but his post above said the $24,000 NEON was getting beat by the SUPRA's that had to have atleast $30-35k invested....how can you tell just by looking at it..... who knows they coulda bought the car like it sat for $25k.....ya never know....
__________________
working my way back up...





Originally Posted by JoKiE crx4294
What do i have to prove to anyone?....umm NOTHING!!
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2006 | 04:40 PM
  #75 (permalink)  
canyouheminow's Avatar
Calmer than you are
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 780
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by YBlegal
that and the fact of all this was refering to the pic. that he made saying "SUPRA, all that money spent only to get beat by a $30,000 NEON" but his post above said the $24,000 NEON was getting beat by the SUPRA's that had to have atleast $30-35k invested....how can you tell just by looking at it..... who knows they coulda bought the car like it sat for $25k.....ya never know....
here's a quote from kbb on a 96 with 65000 miles ranging from $19-$16 http://www.kbb.com/kb/ki.dll/kw.kc.u...p;cpe&11;TO;B9

and 98 with 65000 6spd ranging from $25-$22
http://www.kbb.com/kb/ki.dll/kw.kc.u...cp;cpe&9;TO;B9

and here's a quote from nada another 98 w/ 65000 miles ranging from $28-$32
http://www.nadaguides.com/uv/viewres...wPr=1&wPg=2032

So you take into account the body work done, the performance mods, spray, wheels and tires they easily spent $35k+, and I can probably guess that parts for that car are not cheap. I really don't really have a problem with supra's I think they are fast, but for the amount of money spent on them to make them fast I can think of a few othe choices before I would go investing in one. I make a simple joke and you guys flame me and turn into captain save a car.
__________________
TR's WTR Crew Member #6
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2006 | 04:44 PM
  #76 (permalink)  
YBlegal's Avatar
Broke not Built
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 8,730
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by canyouheminow
here's a quote from kbb on a 96 with 65000 miles ranging from $19-$16 http://www.kbb.com/kb/ki.dll/kw.kc.u...p;cpe&11;TO;B9

and 98 with 65000 6spd ranging from $25-$22
http://www.kbb.com/kb/ki.dll/kw.kc.u...cp;cpe&9;TO;B9

and here's a quote from nada another 98 w/ 65000 miles ranging from $28-$32
http://www.nadaguides.com/uv/viewres...wPr=1&wPg=2032

So you take into account the body work done, the performance mods, spray, wheels and tires they easily spent $35k+, and I can probably guess that parts for that car are not cheap. I really don't really have a problem with supra's I think they are fast, but for the amount of money spent on them to make them fast I can think of a few othe choices before I would go investing in one. I make a simple joke and you guys flame me and turn into captain save a car.
i personally dislike supras...so the captain save-a-car is out the window....just making a few comments....
__________________
working my way back up...





Originally Posted by JoKiE crx4294
What do i have to prove to anyone?....umm NOTHING!!
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2006 | 05:35 PM
  #77 (permalink)  
HPNOTIQracing's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,696
Likes: 0
Default

my favorite
couldnt be truer
__________________

Uploaded with ImageShack.us
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2006 | 05:38 PM
  #78 (permalink)  
95gainfla's Avatar
smokes weed...everyday.
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,616
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by canyouheminow
I make a simple joke and you guys flame me and turn into captain point-out-a-retard.

fixed.
__________________
I <3 RooR!!!!!!


TR "Old Skool EF" Member #121(aka#420)
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2006 | 05:47 PM
  #79 (permalink)  
Drivermod03's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 7,161
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by HPNOTIQracing
my favorite
couldnt be truer
...No comment
Reply
Old Feb 27, 2006 | 06:22 PM
  #80 (permalink)  
JonLGT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Just for decoration
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 10,868
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by canyouheminow
here's a quote from kbb on a 96 with 65000 miles ranging from $19-$16 http://www.kbb.com/kb/ki.dll/kw.kc.u...p;cpe&11;TO;B9

and 98 with 65000 6spd ranging from $25-$22
http://www.kbb.com/kb/ki.dll/kw.kc.u...cp;cpe&9;TO;B9

and here's a quote from nada another 98 w/ 65000 miles ranging from $28-$32
http://www.nadaguides.com/uv/viewres...wPr=1&wPg=2032

So you take into account the body work done, the performance mods, spray, wheels and tires they easily spent $35k+, and I can probably guess that parts for that car are not cheap. I really don't really have a problem with supra's I think they are fast, but for the amount of money spent on them to make them fast I can think of a few othe choices before I would go investing in one. I make a simple joke and you guys flame me and turn into captain save a car.
So the Supra gets flamed for having such a great resale value? If you would take a Skittle over a Supra you should have your head examined. I would rather have a "slow" turbo Supra than a 10 second SRT. Hell I bet a Supra in good shape has a better resale value than a Skittle that just rolled off the lot. That is why you got flamed.
__________________

R.I.P. Brian Nichols 02/07/1989-11/24/2008
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:34 PM.