Saw my first new M5 today
OG MUDBONE 240sx
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 7,436
Likes: 0
i have driven them(through a parking lot lol) and yes they are garbage, i would take a new zo6 over it anyday, im sure they are fast and all, but they are too big for me and i dont like how they look. they are BIG and unsporty looking, sound like crap(they sound a bit better when you are under load, but i personally still dont like the sound).
__________________
Srqspeed.com
-Dane
98 240 w/ bolt-onsSrqspeed.com
Trunks are for corpses.
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 978
Likes: 0
Wait a second - I read an article saying that the M5 had a fully electronic valvetrain....
I still see camshafts there... What's with that?
I still see camshafts there... What's with that?
__________________
1986 Mazda RX7 GXL - "Champagne"
134.7 RWHP - Going slow in style
1986 Mazda RX7 GXL - "Champagne"
134.7 RWHP - Going slow in style
7M 2JZ bird in pear tree
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 8,532
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by AbortRetryFail
Wait a second - I read an article saying that the M5 had a fully electronic valvetrain....
I still see camshafts there... What's with that?
I still see camshafts there... What's with that?
VALVETRONIC and double VANOS so you have continually variable valve timing and lift with intelligence on all 4 cams
__________________
ASE: Brakes
Yea..that very well could have been the most retarded idea I've ever heard, but .. do it anyway. -TheShow50h
ASE: Brakes
Yea..that very well could have been the most retarded idea I've ever heard, but .. do it anyway. -TheShow50h
