General Car Chat Talk about cars in general. All makes and models - strictly car discussion.

Any one got the SI yet ?

Old Dec 8, 2005 | 07:02 AM
  #71 (permalink)  
Road Rage's Avatar
Shake n' Bake
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 5,422
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by civicus
i dont know i just hate those old "classic" cars that people seem to like. Big heavy square boxes with no personality. With the exception of the grand national. Its big and square and boring but I still love it. Oh and by the way there are plenty of people who will do an engine swap on a civic for less than $500.
I guess my 63 Continental has no personality.....
__________________

Old Dec 8, 2005 | 07:36 AM
  #73 (permalink)  
number_2's Avatar
...isn't other people.
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 8,518
Likes: 0
Default

exactly. hell, even honda does it! b18's = 1.8l, k20's = 2l, etc. what was the point here again?
__________________
Old Dec 8, 2005 | 08:09 AM
  #74 (permalink)  
The Hedgehog's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 8,359
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by kornflake
well i think the reason you see older cars on the road today is that when they were bought there was less places to go . Now days its no thing to put 100,000 miles on a car within 2-4 years . Avg life span of a car now days is 5years . then its time to trde it in for a new 1 . thats why all the car manufactors come out with new modles every 5-6 years
You really are a moron...I know a lot of people with older cars that HAVE A TON OF FUCKING MILES ON THEM...Go take your ricer ass somewhere else...This thread is retarded...Seriously
Old Dec 8, 2005 | 08:25 AM
  #75 (permalink)  
DETriment's Avatar
Get off my lawn
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,978
Likes: 0
Default

the japanese engine codes have alot more information about the engineering of the engine than the american displacement numbers do. dont get me wrong; i love all things fast, but i prefer imports for mainly the gas mileage and the light weight. i love classic cars, but something, lets use as an example, the nissan sr20det, has alot more information than, let say, the chevy sb 350

lets look:
nissan:
sr=engine family, kinda useless
20=displacement in liters, 2.0 liters
d=dual overhead cam
e=electronic ignition
t=turbo

sbc:
350= 350 cubic inches....

cams? valves? carbuerated? pistons? anything else? nope.
i only know the answers because i pay attention to all of types of engines, domestic and imports both.


its not that difficult to educate yourself on these engine codes, they really arent that complex and you only make yourself look ignorant by calling the engine codes unsimple.
__________________
-Nate-

[xbox360]DETrimentS14[/xbox360]
Old Dec 8, 2005 | 08:42 AM
  #76 (permalink)  
Troux's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 3,877
Likes: 0
Default

It's also not hard to know that every V8 out there had 16 valves, 1 cam, and carburetion. They aren't all as simple as an sr20, though. Especially toyota's nonsense. Old motors are simpler than newer ones in EVERY way. You can't argue against that.
Old Dec 8, 2005 | 08:49 AM
  #77 (permalink)  
BigBadBuick's Avatar
Livin' Large
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 13,218
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Troux
It's also not hard to know that every V8 out there had 16 valves, 1 cam, and carburetion.
I really hope this is sarcasm because you are wrong on all counts.........
__________________
Old Dec 8, 2005 | 08:49 AM
  #78 (permalink)  
BigBadBuick's Avatar
Livin' Large
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 13,218
Likes: 0
Default

I think it's safe to say no one has the new SI yet. Question answered, locked.
__________________



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:56 AM.