i gota friend who is arguing with me, telling me that b16's suck and sr's suck, and that the older the motor the slower.... please give me a touch of proof so i can slap him

 

yes, b16s suck cause they have no torque and minimal HP.

Rear drive SRs do not suck. Redtops and blacktops were the same power wise I believe.

 

Tell him about the original GTO, the Buick GN, hell tell him to go to a track event (not 1320) and you'll see nothing newer than 10 years unless it is a ZO6 or Cobra or something. B16 = slow. If it comes from Honda, it is slow, no matter what. NSX is decent, but everything else is SLOW. If SR's suck then why are they in everything from Nissans to a Chevy S10? nevermind, some honduh ricer will come up on here and complain about why some honda motor swap everyone is doing is soooo good, because it is JDM (aka low mileage motor thats been sitting in a junkyard) and has a whopping 9 HP more.

 

your friend is a lepton, nuff said.

 

But her's was the farthest thing you can possibly get from stock.

 

true or false, the B16 was in the 9s, and its generally regarded that 9s are fast.

Therefore, a B16 can be fast.


there aren't any stock V8, V10, or V6s in the 9s...

"farthest thing from stock" is subjective.