Chrysler 300c
Livin' Large
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 13,218
Likes: 0
Did you say 13.9 stock? That's faster than my car on the motor. I'll be at the dealership later, just think of the cough*nitrous*cough possibilities 
I just saw a base model one on 19, they look a little weak from the rear, but I like the nose and profile.
I just saw a base model one on 19, they look a little weak from the rear, but I like the nose and profile.
__________________
Just Ledoux it!
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 14,252
Likes: 0
Originally posted by 340duster
yep....the MDS...while cruising on the highway...it shuts down the passenger side bank of cylinders, that lets it pull about 25 on hte highway...and the only one to get the E-class transmission are the hemis...the V6 versions (Base (200 hp), Touring, Limited(250 hp each)) all use the same transmission as the Prowler, Intrepid, 300M, and the other LH cars
yep....the MDS...while cruising on the highway...it shuts down the passenger side bank of cylinders, that lets it pull about 25 on hte highway...and the only one to get the E-class transmission are the hemis...the V6 versions (Base (200 hp), Touring, Limited(250 hp each)) all use the same transmission as the Prowler, Intrepid, 300M, and the other LH cars
__________________
http://www.myspace.com/jdreade
http://www.myspace.com/jdreade
Registered User
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
it doesnt fully shut them down...what it does is put in just enough fuel to keep them alive so that when you floor it, they come back on instantly...but it runs just like an I-4 from my understanding...and yes...car and driver had it pull a 0-60 run in 5.3 seconds and the 1/4 in 13.9...and this wont need nitrous...there are already so many parts in development for them....edelbrock just made headers for the rams that add a tremendous amount of mid-range tq and hp...to the tune of about 28 hp and 34 lb-ft over the midrange, with the gains at peak being 9 and 11, respectively
big bad buick....i believe i saw your car out at sunshine one night running no time....but according to the friendly announcer, it was quite a bit quicker than 8.59...thats pimp as hell
big bad buick....i believe i saw your car out at sunshine one night running no time....but according to the friendly announcer, it was quite a bit quicker than 8.59...thats pimp as hell
__________________
Just Ledoux it!
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 14,252
Likes: 0
Originally posted by 340duster
it doesnt fully shut them down...what it does is put in just enough fuel to keep them alive so that when you floor it, they come back on instantly...but it runs just like an I-4 from my understanding...
it doesnt fully shut them down...what it does is put in just enough fuel to keep them alive so that when you floor it, they come back on instantly...but it runs just like an I-4 from my understanding...
The system deactivates the valve lifters. This keeps the valves in four cylinders closed, and there is no combustion. In addition to stopping combustion, energy is not lost by pumping air through these cylinders
__________________
http://www.myspace.com/jdreade
http://www.myspace.com/jdreade
Guest
Posts: n/a
I despise Chrysler products more than GM's and I must admit it looks good to me. My thoughts exactly on the Rolls comparison, even a Bentley to some degree.
Now they need to add $100k to the sticker and every rapper / athlete will have one in their garage.
Now they need to add $100k to the sticker and every rapper / athlete will have one in their garage.
Registered User
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Originally posted by Scott
I despise Chrysler products more than GM's and I must admit it looks good to me. My thoughts exactly on the Rolls comparison, even a Bentley to some degree.
Now they need to add $100k to the sticker and every rapper / athlete will have one in their garage.
I despise Chrysler products more than GM's and I must admit it looks good to me. My thoughts exactly on the Rolls comparison, even a Bentley to some degree.
Now they need to add $100k to the sticker and every rapper / athlete will have one in their garage.
and explain to me, why do you despise chrysler? is it because the cars actually have style, or because they have the best engines?btw: the styling is bringing back the Original 300s from the 50s and 60s...they all had big grilles, so they brought that back after the radical departure they had with the 300M
__________________
Last edited by 340duster; May 3, 2004 at 12:17 PM.
Livin' Large
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 13,218
Likes: 0
I hope that GM will come back out with a rear wheel drive full size again. Ford/Lincoln never left it, Dodge/Chrysler is back in the game, and my Buick is the last of the full size rear drive models from GM. I love the car even though I was always a ford guy, I'd love to see a new caprice/roadmaster/fleetwood platform with a LS-1/LS-6 :o Looks like I'll have to look to Chrysler in the future, I'm not a mod-motor fan, and GM is out of the game for now.
__________________
Registered User
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Originally posted by BigBadBuick
I hope that GM will come back out with a rear wheel drive full size again. Ford/Lincoln never left it, Dodge/Chrysler is back in the game, and my Buick is the last of the full size rear drive models from GM.
I hope that GM will come back out with a rear wheel drive full size again. Ford/Lincoln never left it, Dodge/Chrysler is back in the game, and my Buick is the last of the full size rear drive models from GM.
__________________
