View Poll Results: Which one would you buy? (assuming you could afford both)
2002 RSX-S
6
26.09%
2000 Si w\ aftermarket parts.
2
8.70%
Neither, I can buy something that is faster and outhandles both of them for a more competittive price.
15
65.22%
Voters: 23. You may not vote on this poll
Which one?
Thread Starter
TR Balla Donor Supreme
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,857
Likes: 0
Originally posted by gabedesign
out of those two id get the rsx. id like to do all the modding myself, personally.
out of those two id get the rsx. id like to do all the modding myself, personally.
Thread Starter
TR Balla Donor Supreme
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,857
Likes: 0
a used WRX, I didn't even look any up, because I thought they were expensive.
EDIT: I've heard they don't have much leg room.
EDIT: I've heard they don't have much leg room.
Thread Starter
TR Balla Donor Supreme
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,857
Likes: 0
Originally posted by type-j-spec
not used you can pick one up for 18,17, sometimes 16g
not used you can pick one up for 18,17, sometimes 16g
Thread Starter
TR Balla Donor Supreme
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,857
Likes: 0
Originally posted by TheShow50h
Why not pick up a brand new srt-4 for less than 20g's? Why buy used when you can have the same performance from a brand new car at the same price?
Why not pick up a brand new srt-4 for less than 20g's? Why buy used when you can have the same performance from a brand new car at the same price?
15 seconds EXHILARATION
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 7,801
Likes: 0
2000 is in the middle of a kind of "dead zone", cheap performance cars were hard to come by, although one of the major drag-strip players that's no longer in existance, the f-body, was still being produced, at least. I'd vote WRX, SRT-4, if you're willing to drop a year and look hard, 99 GSX or GST.
