Timeslip DB
to the entries of the 99 Modena and the bad_ass_honda.. numbers just don't add up at all...
Got traction?
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 2,145
Likes: 0
MyCarWillDestroyYou... Gu
1999 360 Modena
0.954
06.147@110mph
09.631@168mph
3. Dragin
1987 Ford Mustang GT
1.312
6.29@
09.79@139.6
4. bad_ass_honda
95 honda accord
1.36
06.51@92.34
10.013@128.65
6. Strokd85
1985 Mustang LX Coupe N/A
06.44@107.3
10.05@134.7
I agree. How can a Fwd car cut a 60ft(wasn't yours Derek in the low 1.3's)
and have less of a mph in the 1/8 and 1/4 and have a lower ET? I know all about the power vs weight ratio but the mph is over 5mph difference. I don't buy it if the 60ft is close to as yours. IF that's valid they should post a vid or pic of the slip. As far as the 360 Modena I'm sure a guy with a Ferrari would be posting on this sight.
168 mph? I doubt a production Ferrari can trap like that in stock trim in 1320 feet. Hell that's faster mph than Renegade. Hey if they can do it then so can I. 
See sig. -Mark
98' red cobra
www.need-4-speed.com
9.35@158.8 (1.29 60ft)
1999 360 Modena
0.954
06.147@110mph
09.631@168mph
3. Dragin
1987 Ford Mustang GT
1.312
6.29@
09.79@139.6
4. bad_ass_honda
95 honda accord
1.36
06.51@92.34
10.013@128.65
6. Strokd85
1985 Mustang LX Coupe N/A
06.44@107.3
10.05@134.7
I agree. How can a Fwd car cut a 60ft(wasn't yours Derek in the low 1.3's)
and have less of a mph in the 1/8 and 1/4 and have a lower ET? I know all about the power vs weight ratio but the mph is over 5mph difference. I don't buy it if the 60ft is close to as yours. IF that's valid they should post a vid or pic of the slip. As far as the 360 Modena I'm sure a guy with a Ferrari would be posting on this sight.
168 mph? I doubt a production Ferrari can trap like that in stock trim in 1320 feet. Hell that's faster mph than Renegade. Hey if they can do it then so can I. See sig. -Mark98' red cobra
www.need-4-speed.com
9.35@158.8 (1.29 60ft)
