IMO yes parts are cheaper on the 302 but to make the same power that a bolt-on 4.6 4v makes you'll have to get H/C/I for the 95. How much is that going to cost? Or you can get the 96, do bolt-ons and run a small 100 shot and run low 11's all day. I think you'll get out cheaper in the long run. My $.02

-Mark

 

i'm leaning strong to the 95 and I know i would need to go to the mass air comp, the 95 comp is a fincky bitch.

 

i just sold my blown sn 95 the lowest dyno #s where 340 rwhp w an auto and best #s 430 . we had over 20 k in the car almost every mod you could do to it ! if i where you i would stay away from a 94 95 if you want to mod it , parts are cheap yes but the computers are a POS !! i would go w a fox 5.0 or 4.6 96 up !
just my 2 cents!

 

How difficult is it to swap out the wiring harness and ecu for an A9L setup?

Sounds like it'd be the best mod to do to allow you to heavily mod the car and NET the gains!

-Josh

 

Tweecer..... all problems are solved. The 94-95 ECM is actually better/easier to tune with compared to a older fox ECM.

 

/\ well thurrrrrr ya go!

 

oh and on the cams, The reason the E303 isnt a good cam for 94-95 ecm. It has such a short Lobe separation. The shorter the Lobe separation the less vacuum at idle....