This guy removed the back seat to save weight?

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Sep 12, 2006 | 02:44 AM

#1 (permalink)

Stangonline

Thread Starter

Registered User

Joined: Jun 2004

Posts: 2,983

Likes: 0

This guy removed the back seat to save weight?

eBay Motors: Ford : Mustang (item 330027111258 end time Sep-17-06 21:30:00 PDT)

lol

__________________
Jeff

93 Coupe - check out my blog - http://www.93coupe.com
01 Cobra - Stockified - Wife Owned and operated
68 Coupe PROJECT <- Been in the family for 25 years!

Sep 12, 2006 | 03:40 AM

#2 (permalink)

Scott

Guest

Posts: n/a

Pretty sure that diamond plate is way heavier than the seat.

Sep 12, 2006 | 03:52 AM

#3 (permalink)

Wukindada

Registered User

Joined: Nov 2005

Posts: 1,328

Likes: 0

I am sure that car has been treated very gently for those 94k....

The notchback was always my fav though!!

Sep 12, 2006 | 04:53 AM

#4 (permalink)

shinysideup

TR Balla Donor Supreme

Joined: Mar 2004

Posts: 3,373

Likes: 0

thats gotta have some serious reverb.

I used thin sheet alum(nhra spec) to seal mine completely from the fuel and battery in the trunk. I did carpet it tho.

whats the box i see behind drivers seat?

Sep 12, 2006 | 05:01 AM

#5 (permalink)

Wukindada

Registered User

Joined: Nov 2005

Posts: 1,328

Likes: 0

You mean the amp on the back panel? Guys trying to save wt installing diamond plate & having a stereo system

Sep 12, 2006 | 05:16 AM

#6 (permalink)

boostedOne

Guest

Posts: n/a

Its lighter than a diamond plated backseat maybe?

I didnt see him say he removed it to save weight though, just that it was removed. Some people just dont like the look of the back seat, and even crazier they do like the look of diamond plate on a car interior.