Ford, Lincoln, Mercury Tech Automotive Related Topics Only !

speed density + camshaft

Thread Tools
 
Old Feb 14, 2005 | 05:49 AM
  #11 (permalink)  
mx-4u2nv's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 351
Likes: 0
Default

I was running a E-303 cam on my car when it was speed density and it seemed fine, although it did have a surge at idle of about 200 rpm not to big. some put a check valve in the map sensor and this seems to do the trick for a little bit. I went with mass air and it cost me a total of about $155.00 the new a9l comp from discount was 102.00 out the door including tax, and pro-m sells the adaptor that will alow you to still run your speed density harness with the mass air, and this costs $53.00. You could pick up a used stock mass air for pennys on the dollar. If this is something you are interested in call (24 541-4780 and ask to talk to FLETCH and he will help you, and if need be talk you through it. it took me about 30 min for the install hardest part is finiding the #60 pin. if you need help pm me.
__________________
"Been educating 4drwhore since 11/24"

Originally Posted by Na306StAnG
I only date chicks with down syndrome this way I know from day one their fucking retarded.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2005 | 11:58 AM
  #12 (permalink)  
stangerang's Avatar
whoopdy fucking do!
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,852
Likes: 0
Default

i would leave the cam alone untill you've done at least heads intake and or headintake work........ from what i have seen read, the stock cam is actually a nice performance cam, and you can get alot of HP out of the motor with the stock cam...........


no need to run a huge cam unless you can get the extra air with it..........
__________________
200 points away from a 300
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2005 | 04:17 PM
  #14 (permalink)  
AOD_87_GT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Destroyer of Senses
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Default

OK, so the cam will stay stock. I appreciate everyone's input, especially Helmut's explanation of why I should postpone this modification. However, since it was brought up:
Originally Posted by HELMUT RONER
You say you're going to get a lower mileage and newer Mustang, but take into account the amount of work you will put into it will be no different than what you could do with a 1987 Mustang.
Although I am perfectly content with my 87 GT hatchback, I would / will be looking for a coupe when / if another car seems to be a better option. I plan on purchasing a new engine sometime soon as this old one needs to go. However, as I stand with the speed density currently still in place, would a swap from EFI to carb. be simpler than getting an engine and converting it to MAF? I have 176k on this car, and when I get the engine done, I am going to get a built one. Would it be better to just convert to MAF and get another EFI engine, or is it rather simple to go from speed density to carbed? (Or which one is a better option?) I have been wondering this for a while; Obviously there are advantages and disadvantages to both, just looking for some input on the matter. Like I said: new topic, but since it was mentioned, figured I'd take advantage of everyone's knowledge.
__________________
manuals are always faster...yeah right

Last edited by AOD_87_GT; Feb 14, 2005 at 04:23 PM.
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2005 | 05:47 PM
  #15 (permalink)  
HELMUT RONER's Avatar
USAFR Veteran
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,487
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, FL
Default

For me, it's simple. Parts - Mass air meter of your choice and bracket that bolts to strut tower. Air inlet or the cold air induction kits that all the kids use these days. Used or remanufactured EEC-IV. MAF harness connector cut out of another Ford vehicle (doesn't have to just be a Mustang). Some length of wire along with the harness. Cut out the main EEC connector to the computer from another Ford vehicle so you'll have pins with wire to spare. You'll remove the old EEC from the bracket. Seat the newer one in place. Add & move required pins around inside EEC main connector and solder wire ends together to the MAF harness and connect to MAF sensor. Connect main connector to EEC and disconnect the hose to MAP sensor on firewall. Cap off the hose that came off the MAP sensor and start the car.

A lot simpler than spending hours removing wiring in the engine bay and figuring out where the hot leads are for gauges, ignition, etc., etc. for a carburator conversion. You do the conversion that is best suited to you and/or your personal knowledge. Converting a speed density is easier for me and it's my opinion to stick with EFI if I were in your place because it's already there.
__________________
Helmut

Reply
Old Feb 14, 2005 | 05:55 PM
  #16 (permalink)  
AOD_87_GT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Destroyer of Senses
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Default

Thank you for taking the time to answer my q's with some detail. I consider myself pretty knowledgeable on cars, but on them in general. Just now am I actually strting to turn wrenches, so therefore I have questions. Wasn't sure how difficult the carb change would be, some people had done it and others hadn't, figured I would throw it out there. Again, thanks to those with input, and MAF will be in the near future...
__________________
manuals are always faster...yeah right
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2005 | 01:04 PM
  #18 (permalink)  
AOD_87_GT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Destroyer of Senses
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Default

I'll try to be there. As of now, I have nothing stopping me from going.
__________________
manuals are always faster...yeah right
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jdm_2dr
Nissan/Infiniti Tech
19
May 8, 2009 12:59 PM
ACR2NV
General Car Chat
85
Nov 8, 2002 08:08 AM
RainmanEK
General Car Chat
15
Jan 22, 2002 10:53 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:47 PM.