Ford, Lincoln, Mercury Tech Automotive Related Topics Only !

chances of finding a svo mustang?

Thread Tools
 
Old Mar 15, 2004 | 08:43 PM
  #11 (permalink)  
Alan's Avatar
drives euro trash
 
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 7,036
Likes: 0
Default

Originally posted by Geoffrie
wow quick replys on the ford board! Swapping engines around isn't that big of a deal for me. I could see a coupe being lighter than the hatch. Is there a difference in the years - are the early foxes better/lighter or the later?

Thanks
Jeff
I think airbags started in 91...so any pre-91 LX notch will be a bit lighter than the later years (but it is not as if you couldn't just remove the airbag bits and pieces from the later model).
__________________
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2004 | 10:57 PM
  #13 (permalink)  
herrcomestrouble's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,762
Likes: 0
Default

My little brother has a Merkur.. runs pretty stout... needs a paint job.. thats about it. has alot of head work done. AMong some other things. give me a call tomorrow if you think you might be interested.. 813-376-0602 ask for Cody. Oh and btw check out Merkurclub.com.. MANY MANY parts for those cars.... it isnt as hard as alan said it is to find parts...
__________________

Sn95' Tripple Black Cobra
Mods:Heads/Cam/Intake/Exhaust...just your typical stock mustang...
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2004 | 09:34 AM
  #14 (permalink)  
Leonard's Avatar
OUCH!!!
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,441
Likes: 0
Default Re: chances of finding a svo mustang?

Originally posted by Geoffrie
I want one basicly to build a autocross/track/drift car. Handling is my primary concern here so I Like the ideal of the 2.3 turbo for less weight and better balance...


Before you go dropping money into a mustang, you need to learn a LOT more about what it takes to make them handle well for autox.

The front suspension geometry is pretty much horrible. It suffers from severe camber gain under compression. The only way to combat that and make it turn is to allign it with a large amount of static camber. That's a bandaid fix at best. It hurts straightline braking and makes turn in feel very soft (basicly you're running on the inside edge of the tire whenever the wheels are near straight so there is very little contact patch). And you'll still plow and eat tires.

You will not be competative at autox. The only real cure to the front handling is a k member and tubular lower control arms. That will fix the geometry (but at the same time, you'll be bumped to C Prepared and that's an difficult place to think about being competative in anything that still resembles a mustang)

The chassis is not rigid. Subframes help some. Through the floor subframes help more. A cage helps alot.

You'll see similar issues with road racing and although I don't really know much about drift setups, I would imagine you'll have problems there as well. (The front is supposed to stick and not plow, right?)


The 2.3 is a great powerplant, but I think it's better suited to drag racing than autox/road racing. It's only about 100lbs less than a 5.0. Granted, I don't know a lot about it, I'd opt for a naturally aspirated setup over turbo for autox. The lag (even if it's short) will hurt your times alot. When road racing, you have a ton more cooling issues.

That's my $.02. Take it for what it's worth. I'm sure others can step in with more info about the 2.3 vs the 5.0 (dave?)
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2004 | 12:56 PM
  #15 (permalink)  
BigBird's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2000
Posts: 515
Likes: 0
Default

I saw one for sale at the NMRA event last weekend. I wanna say they were asking $2K for it. It was in pretty rough shape but nothing some body work, paint, and new interior wouldn't fix.
__________________
10 SS/RS
06 Busa
Reply




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:34 PM.