Bike Tech If it's a two wheeled vehicle and you wanna talk about it, here's your spot

What Happen

Thread Tools
 
Old Nov 6, 2010 | 09:15 AM
  #21 (permalink)  
squid00's Avatar
teh clit wiggler
 
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 5,011
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Ken600RR
This place is 99% bullshit and 1% bike and occasionally someone talks about their lame as 250 I like it this way. If TR ever ended up like TSB I might cry.

so tell me how TSB is. i dont want to register to view gay shit.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2010 | 09:17 AM
  #22 (permalink)  
_Will_'s Avatar
mi speeks gud
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 4,516
Likes: 0
Default

My impala would pull down 32 on straight highway drives before the ethanol mix, last trip to Ga it pulled down 27. My camaro which had the same engine as my impala and weighed less than 200lbs difference would pull down 24 around town. The impala is getting 19. Sounds like a pattern forming to me

Edit:
My bike doesn't seem affected by it though, I wonder if it's the smaller displacement, higher rshared_pm range, wasted spark ignition, or some combination of those

Last edited by _Will_; Nov 6, 2010 at 09:24 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2010 | 12:28 PM
  #23 (permalink)  
BAMF's Avatar
Thread TERRORIST
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 32,293
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ???
dude, why does your ta get 29mpg and my 02 z28 only get 25?

i did knock down 22 towing the bikes, but still. its a 6speed with a stock gear. i want my extra 4mpg


See that pedal over to the right? Take your fucking foot off of it.
__________________

"They were crying when their sons left, God is wearing black. Hes gone so far to find no hope, hes never coming back. They were crying when their sons left, all young men must go. Hes come so far to find the truth hes never going home."


Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2010 | 01:29 PM
  #24 (permalink)  
J@meson's Avatar
Resident Ginger Kid...
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,172
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ???
dude, why does your ta get 29mpg and my 02 z28 only get 25?

i did knock down 22 towing the bikes, but still. its a 6speed with a stock gear. i want my extra 4mpg
Thats the mpg I got on a FL to NC trip. Only mods are catback lid and filter, Short shifter too but that doesnt matter. At 75-80mph I was getting those miles. Then again the T/A is more aerodynamic then the z28
__________________

2005 Joe Gibbs Silverado # 0396
1988 Monte Carlo SS 5.3/T56 and too many mods.
2003 Honda 954RR
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2010 | 04:04 PM
  #25 (permalink)  
???'s Avatar
???
Capt."Howling Mad"Murdock
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 16,339
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by J@meson
Thats the mpg I got on a FL to NC trip. Only mods are catback lid and filter, Short shifter too but that doesnt matter. At 75-80mph I was getting those miles. Then again the T/A is more aerodynamic then the z28
the fire birds always look it but the cd numbers never back it up. frontal area and how it puts the air back together off the rear window has the most effect. a pointy nose only looks better. so thats not it. i will say the 87-90 wing was better than the same years camaro, but they gave that up for the look from 91 and up.


unless the exhaust mod leaned it out a lot, im just going to call bs. im the king of hypermileing. haha,
__________________
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2010 | 04:23 PM
  #26 (permalink)  
???'s Avatar
???
Capt."Howling Mad"Murdock
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 16,339
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by _Will_
My impala would pull down 32 on straight highway drives before the ethanol mix, last trip to Ga it pulled down 27. My camaro which had the same engine as my impala and weighed less than 200lbs difference would pull down 24 around town. The impala is getting 19. Sounds like a pattern forming to me

Edit:
My bike doesn't seem affected by it though, I wonder if it's the smaller displacement, higher rshared_pm range, wasted spark ignition, or some combination of those
not that i know off hand what year E10 became offical but ive had mine since it was new in 02 and my milage has never changed. it still advs around 18/25 whenever i check.


its been a while since ive read the papers, but the E10 stoich is 14.1 and our cars still target 14.7 at cruise and part throttle. so we are really running leaner on E10, so it all about adv out in real life daily driving. at wot is where the big differance is. but most stock tune cars run on rich side at wot to stay safe over a production run. so its normally ok too to do wot runs on the mixture that leaner than what a 100% gas mixure would be, since 10% isnt to much. now E85 needs a lot more fuel to run the right mixure. oddly enough since its like 115 octain, the flex fuel cars can run it really lean compaired to gas and add a shit load of timing and cruise really lean while dumping tons of egr in so keep the cat alive and it gets good mpg. the last rental i had in CO where i could find E85 almost everywhere was a flex fuel car, it showed me about 4mpg difference while being half priced at the pump.

you prob just need new o2's in the car, over their life time as they wear out, they tell the ecm less voltage which means leaner, so it adds more fuel.
__________________
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2010 | 04:31 PM
  #27 (permalink)  
???'s Avatar
???
Capt."Howling Mad"Murdock
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 16,339
Likes: 0
Default

oh and your car should be a wasted spark coil pack setup too, but it might not be. if its not its better because the coil packs have more dwell time between discharge. the compression, port/valve design would have more effect on the bikes combustion prosses than spark. even those the 4valve prob does allow for a much better spark plug placement than the 2 valve car head.



fak ive wasted way to much of my life chasing hp.
__________________
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2010 | 04:48 PM
  #28 (permalink)  
J@meson's Avatar
Resident Ginger Kid...
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,172
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ???
the fire birds always look it but the cd numbers never back it up. frontal area and how it puts the air back together off the rear window has the most effect. a pointy nose only looks better. so thats not it. i will say the 87-90 wing was better than the same years camaro, but they gave that up for the look from 91 and up.


unless the exhaust mod leaned it out a lot, im just going to call bs. im the king of hypermileing. haha,
Dont forget the Lid and filter...

T/A
http://buzztrader.com/articles/mpg/16533.html
Camaro
http://buzztrader.com/articles/mpg/17417.html


Seems to me your cars sick...
__________________

2005 Joe Gibbs Silverado # 0396
1988 Monte Carlo SS 5.3/T56 and too many mods.
2003 Honda 954RR
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2010 | 05:45 PM
  #29 (permalink)  
BAMF's Avatar
Thread TERRORIST
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 32,293
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ???

fak ive wasted way to much of my life chasing hp.

And just think, you could've just bought a Mustang and been done with it.
__________________

"They were crying when their sons left, God is wearing black. Hes gone so far to find no hope, hes never coming back. They were crying when their sons left, all young men must go. Hes come so far to find the truth hes never going home."


Best Car Insurance | Auto Protection Today | FREE Trade-In Quote
Reply
Old Nov 6, 2010 | 05:48 PM
  #30 (permalink)  
Mixer Mike's Avatar
Unemployed Schmuck
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,417
Likes: 0
Default

Wait for it...

Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:53 PM.