ported or sealed?
King of Ricers
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 11,330
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by P057
I think really everyone would prefer sealed, problem is just the work put into it and the money and power needed for a good sounding one.
ported is just cheaper and easier in my opinion, I think that ported is close enough to sealed that it doesnt sound too far off, so I'm content with ported for now. But i agree, in the future i'll definately look into sealed (also because of limited space in the Z32 im planning on buying)
ported is just cheaper and easier in my opinion, I think that ported is close enough to sealed that it doesnt sound too far off, so I'm content with ported for now. But i agree, in the future i'll definately look into sealed (also because of limited space in the Z32 im planning on buying)
huh? theres less work in sealed. Its much easier to build a sealed box. And ported sounds nothing like sealed. A sealed box will allow you to curve the freq response of your sub to your car's peak frequency tho.
isuck
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by NoTLaDStyle
huh? theres less work in sealed. Its much easier to build a sealed box. And ported sounds nothing like sealed. A sealed box will allow you to curve the freq response of your sub to your car's peak frequency tho.
King of Ricers
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 11,330
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by P057
hrm i heard some sealed systems and they sounded relatively similar, i guess i just need to broaden my horizon
where the port is tuned to will have an increase in response, and will exponentially slope off in either direction making it perfect for getting one particular band down while ignoring others.
