Stroker 2???
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,487
Likes: 0
damn!!!! that looks like a killer speaker...i wouldn't mind hearing one of those or maybe 4 of them haha
__________________
PLAY PAINTBALL LOCALLY
http://www.blitzkriegpaintballfield.com
^^^^^^Click There^^^^^^
Modified Racing Inc.
(Blown99civicSi)
John Solaro 
https://www.tamparacing.com/forums/h...t=john+scammer
https://www.tamparacing.com/forums/h...acing-inc.html
PLAY PAINTBALL LOCALLY
http://www.blitzkriegpaintballfield.com
^^^^^^Click There^^^^^^
Modified Racing Inc.
(Blown99civicSi) John Solaro https://www.tamparacing.com/forums/h...t=john+scammer
https://www.tamparacing.com/forums/h...acing-inc.html
Uber lurker
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,125
Likes: 0
Strokers in the past were basically DBdrag only type subs. I can't imagine they would sound very good.
__________________
Ill say i go by His and Al's thoery of "Your getting sprayed" Doesnt matter what it is. Grandma in the 1982 LTD is gettin the bottle.
Registered User
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 5,103
Likes: 0
From what I've heard, CV originally made those for sq...so you would think they should sound pretty nice. But yeah, those are some of the best out there..I've seen single sub setups in excess of 150dBs. They can handle like 3000w RMS too....
__________________
I got a dig bick. You this read wrong. You read that wrong too.
I got a dig bick. You this read wrong. You read that wrong too.
Thread Starter
Whitey on the Moon
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,346
Likes: 0
again clearly....
Someone on another forums said the buble was to make it more rigid? Something about the second spider being not rigid enough? But i dont know, it was the same thing in the original stroker
Someone on another forums said the buble was to make it more rigid? Something about the second spider being not rigid enough? But i dont know, it was the same thing in the original stroker
