Dale Carson Law and a few others
 

https://yt3.ggpht.com/-h5FsdwF5Lcw/A...ffff/photo.jpgDale Carson Law

Dale Carson Law (904) 355-6777 Jacksonville Criminal Defense Attorney 233 E Bay St #1101 Jacksonville, FL 32202

Use of a stingray
https://www.tamparacing.com/forums/p...ml#post9399352

Traffic tickets

https://www.tamparacing.com/forums/p...ic-ticket.html

Never Talk to the Police; Even With Your Lawyer Present.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M6-xQ3mhGWg

6 No's to know when talking to law enforcement

https://www.tamparacing.com/forums/p...forcement.html

The Secrets of Police Searches - Your right to say no

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ua-qT99vvTs

https://yt3.ggpht.com/-nM-d0_RJOs8/A...ffff/photo.jpgCMHartHayslett



Criminal Defense Attorney Kevin Hayslett informs you on what you may not know regarding police searches. Example: "May we search your car?" Is a request. You have the right to say no. http://www.carlsonmeissner.com/practi...

Standing in front of a judge

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=blKU7cK1HV4

http://www.dalecarsonlaw.com Dale Carson Law (904) 355-6777 Jacksonville Criminal Defense Attorney 233 E Bay St #1101 Jacksonville, FL 32202

Power of saying "I don't know"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eaMGRVkuLzE

https://yt3.ggpht.com/-eus5YS_Ip8k/A...ffff/photo.jpgGerry Oginski
Published on Apr 5, 2017

The POWER of Saying "I DON'T KNOW" During Your Pretrial Deposition and Trial http://www.oginski-law.com/library/ne... NY Medical Malpractice & Personal Injury Lawyer Gerry Oginski Explains 516-487-8207 Email: Gerry@Oginski-Law.com "Did the doctor tell you about the risks of surgery?" "I don't know." "Did the doctor tell you about the benefits of surgery?" "I don't know." "Did your doctor tell you about any alternatives to this surgical procedure?" "I don't know," you reply. If you were a juror listening to a witness answer this way, would you think the witness was lying? Would you think the witness was telling the truth? Would you think the witness simply forgot? The problem is that if you don't know the answer, that locks you into your answer. If you change your answer later, it creates suspicion about your credibility. How is it that you remember the answer now, months later? How is it that you now remember the answer a year later? Watch the video to learn more... Here's a cardiac malpractice case where I was able to achieve a $6 million dollar settlement for my client: http://www.oginski-law.com/video/card... To learn more about how accident & medical malpractice cases work in the state of New York, I encourage you to explore my educational website, ‪http://www.oginski-law.com/library/ne... If you have legal questions and your matter happened here in New York and you're thinking about bringing a lawsuit, I invite you to pick up the phone and call me at 516-487-8207 or by email at Gerry@Oginski-Law.com. This is what I do every day and I'd be happy to chat with you. Law Office of Gerald Oginski 35 South Drive Great Neck, NY 11021 516-487-8207 Email: Gerry@Oginski-Law.com

[h=1]OBJECTION! Master These 18 Essential Courtroom Objections[/h]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XIGhIyZ6HkE

https://yt3.ggpht.com/-Wk0bbBKi24Q/A...ffff/photo.jpgThe Legal Seagull
Published on Nov 24, 2016

Justice Navigator: The Ultimate Video Litigation Tutorial - The Legal Seagull In large part due to Hollywood's sensational portrayal of courtroom dramas, most people have a very distorted understanding of how courtroom objections work. In this video, we go over the most common objections, using actors to play the different court roles (e.g. attorney, witness, judge, etc.). Like this podcast?

Check out The Legal Seagull website for more videos, blog posts, and podcast episodes! Like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter and Instagram. * This is not legal advice. Every jurisdiction has its own laws and court rules. Make sure you read, understand, and comply with the laws and court rules in your jurisdiction. This video is subject to The Legal Seagull's full disclaimer, located at Disclaimer - The Legal Seagull -~-~~-~~~-~~-~- Did the judge sustain your opponent's objection to your leading question? Check out: "Objection to Leading Question? Try Rephrasing" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y-JEJ... -~-~~-~~~-~~-~-

[h=1]Supreme Court takes the wheel in 2 cases of vehicle searches[/h] https://s.yimg.com/lo/api/res/1.2/dS...613.png.cf.jpg JESSICA GRESKO,

• Reactions
• Like
• Reblog on Tumblr
• Share
• Tweet
• Email

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court's justices put themselves in the driver's seat Tuesday, hearing arguments in two cases involving vehicle searches, but it was unclear what routes the justices will take to resolve the cases.
One case involved Pennsylvania state troopers' stop of a rental car driven by a man who wasn't on the rental agreement. The second involved a policeman's search for a stolen motorcycle in Virginia.
"One of the things that I think is very important in these types of cases is the ability to give clear guidance not only to the courts but to the police," Chief Justice Roberts said. Justice Stephen Breyer, when trying to describe a resolution to the case, said he was "looking for something simple."


The first case involves Terrence Byrd, who was driving his fiancee's rental car on a Pennsylvania highway when a state trooper pulled him over for an alleged minor traffic violation. He acted nervous during the stop and told troopers he had a marijuana cigarette in the car, and officers decided to search the car.


Because the rental agreement didn't authorize Byrd to drive the gray Ford Fusion, troopers told him they didn't need his consent for the search. And when troopers opened the trunk, they found body armor and about 2,500 little bags of heroin. Byrd later acknowledged he planned to sell the drugs for roughly $7,000, and a court sentenced him to 10 years in prison.
Byrd's attorneys argue his case has potential consequences for the 115 million car rentals that take place annually in the United States. They say that if the government wins, police will have an incentive to pull over a rental car driver who commits a traffic violation because police will know they can search the car if the driver isn't on the rental agreement.

Byrd tried to get the evidence from the search excluded from his case. But a court ruled that because Byrd was an unauthorized driver, he had no reasonable expectation of privacy in the car and therefore couldn't challenge the search using the Fourth Amendment, which protects against unreasonable searches. The Trump administration and courts in several parts of the country agree that's the right outcome. Other courts disagree.


On Tuesday, Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito seemed to be the most willing to side with the government while Justice Sonia Sotomayor seemed strongly sympathetic to Byrd's argument.
"If we rule that ... someone has no expectation of privacy even when the renter has given it to them, then what we're authorizing is the police to stop every rental car and search every rental car, without probable cause, that might be on the road," Sotomayor said.


Byrd's case dates to 2014, when Latasha Reed, with whom he has five children, rented a car from a Budget rental office in New Jersey. Byrd's lawyers say Reed was his fiancee and the government calls her Byrd's girlfriend, but both sides agree that the rental agreement didn't cover Byrd.
Even so, Reed handed him the keys as soon as she left the rental office. He was later pulled over while driving alone near Harrisburg. The reason a trooper gave for pulling Byrd over was that he spent too long in the left lane making a passing maneuver.


The second case the justices heart Tuesday addressed the issue of whether police need a warrant before searching a vehicle on private property outside a home.
Police arrested Austin Collins after an officer walked onto his driveway and pulled back a tarp covering Collins' motorcycle. It turned out to be stolen. The officer did not have a warrant.


Probing the extent of Virginia lawyer Trevor Cox's argument in defense of the officer's action, Roberts used some pop culture references as he wondered how far officers can go in their searches.


"I mean, if you have an automobile in the house ... Jay Leno's house, right, where he's got dozens of rare cars or the Porsche in Ferris Bueller," Roberts said, invoking the former NBC Tonight Show host and a scene from the iconic 1980s movie "Ferris Bueller's Day Off."
Roberts had the right idea, but the wrong make of car. The car Bueller took for a ride was a Ferrari.