Originally Posted by
dwrec37
argeed that the better the fuel is , atomized, the more effcient the burn, sounds like someone need to do some kinda of bench test, to see if you can still get the same atomization, from a larger injector with a short burst vs the smaller injector with a longer burst.
but i bet his mpg was amazing using that two injector setup!
Not sure how to effectively set up a bench test considering it wouldn't be something you could be able to see with the naked eye... or at least, you shouldn't be able to see it.
the main point between that injector set up was to be able to turn one set off when it wasn't needed. forcing it to run more lean than the ecu would want to go.
it was a really interesting concept. Run as lean as possible, but go slow. and then flip a switch, double the fuel, double the power, when it is needed.
He also ran a water mist injection system to keep temps under control.
Originally Posted by
rhart
Isn't atomization based on the % of the duty cycle of the injector and the pressure imparted on said injector. Think efficiency of the injector. Empire my friend this question is so you. You'll have tons of info to be searching for on this topic. Be honest, wasn't this a rehtorical question...you didn't really expect and answer did you? Hence, you forgot you had posted it. LoL.
lol
you know me too well.
i was actually hoping for some of the tuners/more experienced than myself to chime in.
But I know many of them don't frequent the forums much any more.
it has been interesting doing the research into this. Lots of conflicting info. Hoping some of the engineering students at FSU can produce some decent info.