Apparently you're terrible at research and understanding new/different concepts that rival what you believe to be true.

1)The 'Federal' Reserve: 100% of the Federal Reserves shareholders are private banks. None of its stock is owned by the government.
If PRIVATE BANKS own all of the shares to the F.R., and NO shares are held by the government, that means it's PRIVATELY OWNED.

You think the dollar is worth anything? Ever heard of inflation?
This will help explain:
http://sovereign-investor.com/2011/0...-really-worth/
Your $1 doesn't buy the same shit it use to and certainly not the same amount, and if you think that's balanced out by minimum wage and Americans being paid more than they use to then you're sadly mistaken.
"The Dollar’s Purchasing Power Has Dropped 27% Since 1998"
Another good article:
http://www.taipanpublishinggroup.com...lly-Worth.html

Fiat currency in America is called bullshit no matter what you call it.
Our income tax IS the backing for the printed currency we call 'dollars' or Federal Reserve Notes.
My point is, is that they print more money than what is in the reserve - which our currency is a representation of.
That's no different than me telling you there's $25 on a gift card that's blank!
Another good clip from an article which will help explain:
"Thomas Jefferson is reputed to have said that, “If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their money, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of their property until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.”

Jefferson did not need a crystal ball to see the rise of The Federal Reserve, a private bank which controls the United States’ Money. Jefferson was well aware of the international banksters even in his time. The inevitability of small groups of elite, well-heeled people to group together and prey on their fellow man is not exactly a new thing either.

Black’s Law Dictionary [Sixth Edition, 1991] defines “fiat” as an “A command or order to act. Arbitrary or authoritative order or decision.” “Fiat money” is likewise defined as, “inconvertible paper money made legal tender by a government decree.” Inconvertible to, for example, gold or silver. Made legal only by government decree. “Colored money”, i.e. money with the “deceptive appearance, assumed exterior, concealing a lack of reality.”

Federal Reserve Notes (FRNs) are colored money. They have no value, except by virtue of a government decree -- a decree arrived at under conditions of duress, and thus in all probability invalid. Just as The Decree of Franklin Roosevelt in recalling gold from the hands of the citizenry was under the direction of the international Banksters, the use of FRN’s is a continuation of this directive."
From another good article: http://www.halexandria.org/dward297.htm

So, you are correct, it's not backed by gold anymore.... they took our gold and gave us meaningless paper and plastic which is suppose to represent it, but fails to do so by a long shot...feel better? Under the same terms i should follow suit now and sell a blind kid a mute-ninja-bird that's dead silent and who's cage can never be opened because he'll never be able to find it if it escapes. That's just as rational, right?

2)Income Tax Law (or lack thereof): A simple to understand explanation.
"The IRS believes the 16th Amendment is the law that allows them to tax earnings. That seems perfectly reasonable given the language of the Amendment. The simple explanation is in what it doesn't do, rather than what it does do.
1. It does not permit any taxation on the income itself.
2. It doesn't create any new power to tax outside of what was allowed by our Constitution.
3. It doesn't change the Constitution in any way, (direct tax must still be apportioned, or shared by the states), as stated in the Constitution.
A direct tax is one on property, versus activities. The point that I am making here is that the term income tax as is stated in the 16th Amendment and the Revenue Code, is misrepresented. The Supreme Court ruled in an 1895 case that the income tax contained in the Tariff act of 1894 was unconstitutional because it was a direct tax and not apportioned. The 16th Amendment simply added the protection of making the income tax forever an excise tax that would not have to be apportioned. According to the court, the Amendment was to take the income tax out of consideration as a direct tax in keeping with our Constitution."

Simply put, the 16th Amendment was designed to falsely legitimize the non-apportioned taxation upon the income of citizens by referring to it as an excise tax. (Also known as an indirect tax)
And that is why there is no black and white law stating we have to pay an apportioned income tax in the private sector. Doing so would blatantly be unconstitutional, so they did it through the back door with a shady amendment.

3) A large reason why marijuana is illegal:....I don't even need to explain this...If you cannot fathom these FACTS then please do us all a favor and do not have children.
Do your self a favor and watch this too: The Union
Yeah...more youtube 'bs'.
And/Or do some real research...not the utter butt-fuckery you skimmed to ASSume my 'off the top of my head' misinformation.
I'll help: Why is Marijuana Illegal? « Drug WarRant

RFID tags:
The REAL Purpose of the REAL ID
Pretty much all you need to know there, and more can be found from legitimate sources.
The RFID tag Myth Buster Episode was banned by American Express, VISA, etc.
This is important because if they intend to saturate our country with these personal information laden micro-chips they need to be secured in an intelligent manner.
As said in the article: "As has been demonstrated so very many times in the past, security through obscurity is no security at all."
Mythbusters RFID episode banned | bit-tech.net

Do your self a favor and learn about the world around you.
Unfortunately people float through life and understand things based on answers they're being told and assume it to be true instead of asking how or why and investigating your self to validate the truth behind that 'answer'.

This may be a little complex but I'll have some faith in you:

Example: The answer to the question is 5. Simple and plain, 5. Who cares about it?
A 5 is a five, whatever the problem was it's solved and there's no need for further investigation because 5 is the answer.
That is how your average sheeple think.
When i add words to it - it becomes more important...

5 People.
Getting a little interesting but still '5'.

5 People died in a car crash today when hit by a drunk driver, traveling in excess of 80mph, 3 of the occupants were children.
Wow... that's terrible.

You see how more information gives you a different perspective on that previously boring number? You now have a negative feeling towards the 5 because of the context it's in. 5 lives lost and families ruined.

Easily done in the opposite direction:
Remaining 5 people found alive during a deep mine-collapse rescue-effort, all in stable condition.
Holy crap, that's great!
Now, the number 5 gives a positive feeling due to the positive context. 5 lives saved and a sigh of relief is felt for these survivors.

Look at what people say AND do. More often than not - if there's some bs going on - chances are their 'do' doesn't match what they 'say' and should raise a red flag.

If i can take '5' minutes using this simple concept and make you feel drastically different about a single stupid number - then what do you think people with private agendas can do with practically limitless resources - on a large scale with a team(s) of people trained to do exactly that, very well. And just because you cannot understand their reasoning for it does not mean there is no reason for it.

The whole concept is certainly not nearly as unrealistic as it may seem...