Thread: Ls7 Nsx
View Single Post
Old Sep 9, 2010 | 09:22 AM
  #164 (permalink)  
omgwtfbbq!'s Avatar
omgwtfbbq!
I race sailboats
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 4,216
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by power2weight
Go ahead and describe this "exact same motor".

Better yet, make it lighter than the LS7 (good luck with 3 more cams and twice the valves), keep the CG low, keep it compact to fit between the Vette's suspension, make more power and get the same gas mileage (sorry BMW M3 and GT3). And you already addressed the cost issue.

Sorry, but the LSx series of motors will shit all over your theoretical DOHC all day in those categories.
The weight difference would be maybe a couple of pounds, completely negligible. You add 3 cams but you lose all the pushrods and rocker arms. The CG would likewise not be shifted more than a few ten thousandths of an inch, which is again negligible and could be accounted for by changing the oil tank design or something equally as trivial. The engine wouldn't need to be physically larger at all. If the cams called for more valve cover clearance you could easily shorten other components to account for that, if you shortened the stroke you could rev even higher. Audi's V8 engines fit between the radiator and front axle, just as my V6 sits entirely in front of the front axle. They sit the 4.2 in the R8, and even get the 5.2 V10 from the gallardo and the V12 TDI engines to fit without any issue. I don't know why you think DOHC engines are all huge. It would make more power because it could flow more air and that flow is more efficient. Bam.
__________________
Bitches don't know about the twin turbo

BLACK FENDER PART OUT
Reply