Thread: Datsun Dreaming
View Single Post
Old Oct 30, 2009 | 05:42 PM
  #14283 (permalink)  
elitist's Avatar
elitist
TR Balla Donor Supreme
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 6,397
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Z28ricer
A shitty shell huh ? And what about it is shitty ? That is hasnt been a drift missile into a wall so its straight and not fucked up ? Or because it doesnt have some retarded body kit on it ?
Thats cool that you love the FC so much, go build one, its not what I wanted, and I certainly havent run into any sort of issue that makes me need a chassis that is a "very straight forward swap"



I've yet to see you actually prove me wrong about anything technical around here, so good basis for you trying to call me a moron, considering the source dont feel bad if I dont feel insulted.

You seriously sound like someone repetitively crying "wahhh you didnt stay SR and be cool like me" sorry I chose to go to a better drivetrain than you, I really dont care that its not done yet, but amazingly you are awfully concerned with it, quite amusing really
I'm not talking about your shell in particular, I am talking about S13s in general. An FC shell is a far better designed shell than a S13. I have already had a bad ass FC and I would still own one to this day if I actually felt like messing with swapping a piston motor into it. Since you are putting a motor that doesn't belong in a S13, doing the swap into a FC would be about the same difference, probably easier, and it would be in a much better designed platform. FC shells are much more rigid, the rear suspension setup is far superior to an S13 and actually built to improve traction, they have 4 piston brakes factory, they look better IMO, engine bay seems to be bigger, interior seems much more like a "race car" since apparently that's what you are building, etc, etc, etc.

I love how everyone brings in the body kit remark, seriously is that all you have? When I DONT EVEN HAVE A BODY KIT? Yes OMG I have had a body kit on a S13 that I don't even own anymore wow. "that is apparently the response to a losing arguement" or whatever Tim said.
Reply