View Single Post
Old Aug 15, 2009 | 12:38 PM
  #6 (permalink)  
EludeR's Avatar
EludeR
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,667
Likes: 0
Default

Yeah from the factory they are low as hell (the ruckus). I've read several mpg reports on the rebel 250 (honda) getting over 80mpg (in some cases people getting over 100mpg) then again their are some bigger bikes like the shadows that are very close as well overall it is a more efficient mode of transportation.

I still think the ruckus is fine for someone that lives in hyde park or downtown tampa.
Originally Posted by Loren
I'm sure the major factor is that bikes are designed to be fun to ride above all else. Aero is a factor, but a bike still has 1/4 the frontal area of a small car.

The bike I linked wasn't a Ninja, it was a 250cc "entry level" bike. I know a performance bike isn't going to get the best MPG, I didn't bother going there.

You talking about the new 49cc Ruckus? I found this statement in a review: "The Ruckus is abysmal for street riding, unfit for the majority of public roadways." Seriously?
Reply