Thread: Who should sue?
View Single Post
Old Nov 4, 2007 | 01:59 PM
  #17 (permalink)  
Sneakin Deacon's Avatar
Sneakin Deacon
PSSHHH x2
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 14,291
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ridenleanback
well everyone has there opinion, but little did he know until today, he can sue the other guy for the title, he signed a written agreement to it that they are trading cars, contacted 4 good lawyers around the tampa area with free consultation and all said he cant do anything to him because the car was sold as is, since he is not a dealer everything that happens to the car on his hands is his problem. as for the title all 4 lawyers were willing to represent him and said that he can win very easily.
does he have the agreement?
is it notarized?
are there any other witnesses?

the burden of proof will be upon your friend. the defense will say the name is forged, etc etc, since i know this kid didn't get it notarized.

and what does a lawyer with a free consult have to do with anything? how does that make them "good". As far as i knew, every lawyer has to give a free initial consult.

basically, your little buddy is going to be paying...lawyer fees, court costs, expert witness fees, etc etc. and by the sounds of the cars involved, the court expenses for him to sue for the title are going to exceed the cost of the car in question dramatically, and still may not get the title.
__________________
El Pendejo Loco
2002 Suzuki Hayabusa
1507 "dry" block
Brocks megaphone
Spencercycle 10" swingarm
MPS auto shifter
Hays convertible clutch

Yea, that about sums it up...

Reply