View Single Post
Old Aug 23, 2007 | 01:55 PM
  #9 (permalink)  
TIM TIM TIM's Avatar
TIM TIM TIM
could be worse
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 11,421
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by GsT Racer
alright. yeah we were thinking about rx-7's, audi's, and supra's. i see the point now...

2 big turbos would be the best way to go, but very expensive
2 small turbos(stock)can only do so much power
1 big turbo is very good, but the lag would be horrible
1 small turbo would still have lag, and not so much power

so what about a twin turbo setup in which 1 turbo is small, like 1 ballbearing 16g size, and the other is a big turbo, like gt35r size? very quick spool up and low end power, and high power up top also?

what does sequential mean? and does "one on the left bank and one for the right bank" mean 1 turbo per two cylinders, on a 4 cylinder car? or would that be more for a V type engine, one on both headers?

and all of this was meant for a street car.

sequential is like supras and stuff where one is bigger then the other. one for low rpm and one for high.. "left bank and right bank" would be for a V engine where one side off one turbo and the other side off the other turbo. I dont think I have seen any twin turbo kits on a 4 banger, im sure someone has done its for sure not common.
__________________
aim:because tim said

www.generationsofcabinetry.com
Reply