Thread: Dig or Roll?
View Single Post
Old Jan 27, 2007 | 07:52 AM
  #32 (permalink)  
2g's Avatar
2g
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,403
Likes: 0
Default

Dig... rolls are for people who don't know how to keep their power to the ground. I said it in the other thread, if you have such said horsepower and you can't keep it on the ground then you wasted your money. Having 400+ hp and getting no traction = fail. Because it won't help you at the track and last time I checked back in the 90's street racing was done from a dig. Whats this roll racing garbage that people think is street racing now-a-days. Seriously in the earlier 90's there was no excuses like I hear today. You can afford to make your car 300+ hp but can't afford to get the right tires? That makes no sense. You run on street tires, you get no traction thats your own fault. Its not an excuse for losing a race. You bring what you got, you got wheel spin... no traction... your fault.

If you lose a race take it like a man, don't make excuses like...
I didn't have any traction
I'm on street tires
I missed a gear
I didn't "brake boost"
My clutch is going

You know why dig racing is better because for the most part someone lines up both cars and arms raised... drop and go. There's no excuses like...

We weren't lined up
You went on the 2nd horn beep
I wasn't in the right gear
You took the jump
You took off early

Racing in general... is done from a dig not a roll. Thats how come there's so much BS now-a-days and pety excuses because of this roll racing non-sense.
Reply