Thread: To 289 or not to 289 that is the question
View Single Post
Old Jun 15, 2006 | 04:35 PM
  #4 (permalink)  
ODB's Avatar
ODB
S.Y.L.O.
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 16,169
Likes: 0
Default
Originally Posted by Scott
Well .40 over probably took away some of the high revving capability.
thats what I was thinking...isnt there less space beteen the cylinder walls with the 289 punched like this?? heating issues possibly?
Reply
0