Originally Posted by YBlegal
that and the fact of all this was refering to the pic. that he made saying "SUPRA, all that money spent only to get beat by a $30,000 NEON" but his post above said the $24,000 NEON was getting beat by the SUPRA's that had to have atleast $30-35k invested....how can you tell just by looking at it.....
who knows they coulda bought the car like it sat for $25k.....ya never know....
here's a quote from kbb on a 96 with 65000 miles ranging from $19-$16
http://www.kbb.com/kb/ki.dll/kw.kc.u...p;cpe&11;TO;B9
and 98 with 65000 6spd ranging from $25-$22
http://www.kbb.com/kb/ki.dll/kw.kc.u...cp;cpe&9;TO;B9
and here's a quote from nada another 98 w/ 65000 miles ranging from $28-$32
http://www.nadaguides.com/uv/viewres...wPr=1&wPg=2032
So you take into account the body work done, the performance mods, spray, wheels and tires they easily spent $35k+, and I can probably guess that parts for that car are not cheap. I really don't really have a problem with supra's I think they are fast, but for the amount of money spent on them to make them fast I can think of a few othe choices before I would go investing in one. I make a simple joke and you guys flame me and turn into captain save a car.