Originally Posted by canyouheminow
Well it's like this, thursday at bradenton I saw this. 2 supras running, I know a surprise in itself to see, they had at least a minimum of $30-$35k invested in their cars with drag radials and spray turning 12.3's @ 120mph (which is by no means slow) , then a blue skittle with about $22k-$24k invested in it with slicks on turning 12.7's @107mph. So you figure you spend a little more to be getting 10's, and tell me my statement doesn't carry some truth to it. Now I'm only stating the comparisson of money spent to go fast, if it was a looks competition the Supra wins it hands down, or even getting laid factor again supra wins it hands down, or long-gevity or parts lasting again the supra.
you are contradicting yourself...i dont understand how the skittle would cost less money if the supra was more reliable. wouldnt the skittle end up costing a lot more in the long run?