The only way the dealership could do this would be if the fucking moron signed a blank contract, blank bill of sale, blank trade in bill of sale, etc. I'm leaning more towards a simple misunderstanding and the fucktard deciding to use it to try to get out of the car (buyer's remorse) as I find it difficult to believe a big dealer would expose themselves to that sort of civil liability (blank contract, changing figures, etc.) for six pathetic thousand dollars.......
Has this asshole scanned and posted copies of any of the documents from the sale along with something from the credit union showing the differences in figures, or are we supposed to take the word of some punk ass retard that just made a video of himself breaking many many traffic laws and posted it on the world wide web with his fucking name in the credits?

I like that they took the time to put who drove the car in the credits, hopefully they will be prosecuted for wreckless driving, 120+ on the interstate, improper start, etc. even if the dealership doesn't sue. It is right in most contracts that in the event a dealer can't secure financing the vehicle will be returned to the dealership in the condition it left so the dealership does have grounds for a law suit.

Just another fine example of the general public being worse than the evil car dealer, I see it every day. Anyone that thinks the dealership deserved this needs to understand that fuck boy got his T/A back in perfect condition, nobody burned it's tires to the ground or beat the piss out of it (though they should have) Deal fell through, big deal, take the car back like a man and go on with your life.