Originally Posted by 4drwhore

I didn't say that. What I was talking about was the original guy from the thread who posted the pictures talking about how "sorry" the atom is because it didn't beat every car at the trace track in the 1/4 when that is not what it was built for. I doubt the subject of "wonder what this car will do in the 1/4" ever came into the designers head while this car was originally engineered. And with the atom only costing mid 50s vs the cost of an enzo I'm sure the atom sees alot more "real" racing then most of any of the other cars there, it looks like it has definitally been used for it.

The atom is probably one of my all time fav. cars and the idea that I can actually afford one makes it so much more amazing to me. I would also have to say if I could afford both cars I would probably buy and use the atom over the enzo.